A video with z-sorting issue. :p On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Bastian Schneider <badnoob.com@ googlemail.com> wrote:
> I've decompiled the swf and it is only a video, great engine ;-) > > > 2010/12/13 Brian Bosak <[email protected]> > > It did look like just a video, not an actual demo.... >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Jensa Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 >> 3:34 PM To: Away3D.dev Subject: [away3d] Re: rocket ninja mentions Away3D in >> comparison >> The fact that they use Away3D for comparison is very cool. Being >> compared to commercial / proprietary software isn't something that >> happens to every Open Source project out there, so I would say that is >> a testament to how good Away3D really is. >> >> According to their funding press release "..,10,000 building blocks >> known as polygons ... [the] ... level of quality is close to what you >> would find in a high-end console game". Won't $3.5 Million in funding >> buy you something better than a Dreamcast? I like Ninjas, but these >> seem like the american kind. You know the ones that look cool in >> movies but can't fight for real ;-) >> >> That said - I'm sure they'll build a kick-ass engine once they get to >> it, but such claims are pretty lame when all you have to show is some >> 2D Facebook games (that both are copies of bestselling games from >> competitors) and a video of a knight? Did I miss something or did they >> have an actual running demo there? >> >> J >> >> On Dec 12, 6:38 pm, Craig Murray <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Have you guys seen this? Rocket Ninja has a 3D engine and they are >>> claiming how much better than Away3D it is. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> http://www.rocketninja.com/Home/About/Articles/Shr3D-.aspx >>> >> > -- Aji Pamungkas
