+1 for the release, though I don't have anything to update in wiki ;p. Hope I'll have some at least for the next next release
And yeah 0.9652 sounds cool (my dejavu says its not that random either...whatever). I guesss, beyond two decimals (or two dots if you name ur builds a.b.c.d) all the numbers don't carry much significance than to mean they are some nightly or hourly builds, and hence we can think somewhat hackers way and name it as
0.9652 or more better as 0.9452 (to mean its a 0.94 equivalent release)
Jaya
On 12/28/05, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Here's my point. Why do we (who are human beings BTW) need to be rational and logical all the way :)) We can just break the tradition and make a change (and fill out the mailing list with "why .9652?" mails) just for the fun of it :)
Enough of the philosophy, here's the real story. During the hackathon at Apachecon, Glen (I think) was mentioning something (probably about versioning) and said this magical number 0.9652 (which I suppose is a totally random sequence of digits which happened to be higher than .93). Sanjiva caught the word and said "ah cool version number. we should do a release with that". And that's why this release has this weird version number :)--
On 12/28/05, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:+1 for relase
But why Axis2 0.9652? I would prefer 0.94 ..lets keep it logical and
simple. I do not see any need to do something fancy.
The relase number are to give a understanding about the nature of the
relase .. lets keep it that way
Thanks
Srinath
But why
On 12/28/05, Davanum Srinivas < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 from me. Next week sounds good.
>
> On 12/27/05, Eran Chinthaka < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > After our last release on 2nd of December, I think we did enough work
> > to do the next release. We have improved some features during the
> > hackathon and after that also we improved Axis2. And there were number
> > of major fixes we did after 0.93.
> > So how abt having another release, preferrably before next year, or
> > first week of January, the latest.
> > Please let me know your working schedule with Axis2. Do you want some
> > more time to complete the things you are working on ? And please let
> > me know the things that are completed so far as well.
> >
> > And how abt naming the next release as Axis2 0.9652, rather than 0.94
> > ? This is a funny number came up by Glen or Sanjiva during ApacheCon.
> >
> > What do you all think ?
> >
> > 1. Please let me know whether you like to have a release ?
> > 2. If yes, please propose a date
> > 3. Let me know the features or fixes you have done so far by filling
> > the wiki : http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis2/releases/0.94
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chinthaka
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> >
> > iD8DBQFDsVUJjON2uBzUhh8RAsWXAKCONLCrU/36ngRFXMs3Ic57s5u/VQCgq14u
> > lGx94eHmezcQ33L9otcqz5w=
> > =sBz0
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
>
Ajith Ranabahu
--
-- Jaya
