+1 for the release. Chathura
On 12/28/05, jayachandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for the release, though I don't have anything to update in wiki ;p. Hope > I'll have some at least for the next next release > And yeah 0.9652 sounds cool (my dejavu says its not that random > either...whatever). I guesss, beyond two decimals (or two dots if you name > ur builds a.b.c.d) all the numbers don't carry much significance than to > mean they are some nightly or hourly builds, and hence we can think somewhat > hackers way and name it as 0.9652 or more better as 0.9452 (to mean its a > 0.94 equivalent release) > > Jaya > > On 12/28/05, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here's my point. Why do we (who are human beings BTW) need to be rational > and logical all the way :)) We can just break the tradition and make a > change (and fill out the mailing list with "why .9652?" mails) just for the > fun of it :) > > Enough of the philosophy, here's the real story. During the hackathon at > Apachecon, Glen (I think) was mentioning something (probably about > versioning) and said this magical number 0.9652 (which I suppose is a > totally random sequence of digits which happened to be higher than .93). > Sanjiva caught the word and said "ah cool version number. we should do a > release with that". And that's why this release has this weird version > number :) > > > > > > > > On 12/28/05, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > +1 for relase > > > > > > But why Axis2 0.9652? I would prefer 0.94 ..lets keep it logical and > > > simple. I do not see any need to do something fancy. > > > > > > The relase number are to give a understanding about the nature of the > > > relase .. lets keep it that way > > > > > > Thanks > > > Srinath > > > > > > But why > > > On 12/28/05, Davanum Srinivas < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 from me. Next week sounds good. > > > > > > > > On 12/27/05, Eran Chinthaka < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > After our last release on 2nd of December, I think we did enough > work > > > > > to do the next release. We have improved some features during the > > > > > hackathon and after that also we improved Axis2. And there were > number > > > > > of major fixes we did after 0.93. > > > > > So how abt having another release, preferrably before next year, or > > > > > first week of January, the latest. > > > > > Please let me know your working schedule with Axis2. Do you want > some > > > > > more time to complete the things you are working on ? And please let > > > > > me know the things that are completed so far as well. > > > > > > > > > > And how abt naming the next release as Axis2 0.9652, rather than > 0.94 > > > > > ? This is a funny number came up by Glen or Sanjiva during > ApacheCon. > > > > > > > > > > What do you all think ? > > > > > > > > > > 1. Please let me know whether you like to have a release ? > > > > > 2. If yes, please propose a date > > > > > 3. Let me know the features or fixes you have done so far by filling > > > > > the wiki : > http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis2/releases/0.94 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Chinthaka > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) > > > > > > > > > > > iD8DBQFDsVUJjON2uBzUhh8RAsWXAKCONLCrU/36ngRFXMs3Ic57s5u/VQCgq14u > > > > > lGx94eHmezcQ33L9otcqz5w= > > > > > =sBz0 > > > > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ajith Ranabahu > > > > -- > -- Jaya -- Chathura Herath http://www.bloglines.com/blog/chathurah
