+1. Absolutely. Thanks, dims
--- Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, sounds totally reasonable > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:09 PM > Subject: Re: [WSIF] Dependency on JROM > > > > Jeremy Hughes wrote: > > > > > I don't agree that it is totally unusable in any context. It is usable > > > for development purposes. The 90 day license means you'll need to > > > download a new copy then. > > > > If you like, we can take this up with the XML PMC or the Apache board, > > but as a member of both, I can confidently state that it is not the > > intention of Apache to host projects which, by virtue of their > > dependencies, become suitable for development purposes only. The likely > > resolution would be the request for the expulsion of the xml-axis-wsif code. > > > > This being said, the resonable course of action is to take this as an > > issue which is being worked, and provide a grace period of, say, 90 > > days. In other words, either JROM needs to be provided under a suitable > > license (e.g., Apache Software License, IBM Public License, Common > > Public License), or the dependency from WSIF to JROM must be dropped or > > made optional, or the xml-axis-wsif cvs tree will be removed. > > > > Is this acceptable to all? > > > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
