Re: user id request

[David Chappell]

I'm not sure what the issue is, whether its three of us vs one.  All
three of us will be working on this, and would like the ability to check
things in independently, rather than pass it to one person to be the
point.  Having one person act as an intermediary will cause us to spin
extra cycles and also IMO introduces an additional margin for error on
checking in the "right" stuff.

I can assure you that we will not be disruptive to 1.0.
Dave

James M Snell wrote:
> 
> Nah, all three of 'em will do active.
> 
> - James Snell
>      IBM Emerging Technologies
>      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>      (559) 587-1233 (office)
>      (700) 544-9035 (t/l)
>      Programming Web Services With SOAP
>          O'Reilly & Associates, ISBN 0596000952
> 
>      Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous.
>      Do not be terrified, do not be discouraged, for the Lord your
>      God will be with you whereever you go.    - Joshua 1:9
> 
> Richard Sitze/Austin/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/17/2002 11:24:12 AM:
> 
> > >I'm fine with that, but if we go that route the
> > >committer should be whoever is going to do the
> > >most work on the code (would that be Jaime?)...
> 
> > +1
> 
> >
> > *******************************************
> > Richard A. Sitze
> > IBM WebSphere WebServices Development
> 
> >
> > Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 09/17/2002 12:57 PM
> > Please respond to axis-dev
> 
> > To:     "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc:
> > Subject:        RE: user id request
> >
> > I'm fine with that, but if we go that route the committer should be
> > whoever is going to do the most work on the code (would that be
> Jaime?)...
> 
> > --Glen
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:53 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: user id request
> > >
> > >
> > > WHOA WHOA...
> > >
> > > There WAS a vote called for ONE committer, David Chappell.
> > >
> > > There WAS NOT a vote for any others.
> > >
> > > I was silent on David (personally, I'd like to see patches submitted
> > > first), but I'm going to -1 anyone else.  Seems like we've
> > > got someone to
> > > represent the work, and I think we need time to get to know
> > > them before we
> > > call for more submitters without history.  Until 1.0 ships,
> > > this should
> > > have only MINIMAL impact on AXIS.  Taking this slow is the
> > > right thing to
> > > do.
> > >
> > > <ras>
> > >
> > > *******************************************
> > > Richard A. Sitze
> > > IBM WebSphere WebServices Development
> > >

-- 
Sonic Software - Backbone of the Extended Enterprise
--
David Chappell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Office: (781)999-7099
Mobile: (617)510-6566
Vice President and Chief Technology Evangelist, Sonic Software
co-author,"Java Web Services", (O'Reilly 2002)
"The Java Message Service", (O'Reilly 2000)
"Professional ebXML Foundations", (Wrox 2001)
--

begin:vcard 
n:Chappell;Dave
tel;cell:617-510-6566
tel;work:781-999-7099
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.sonicsoftware.com
org:Sonic Software Corp.    <BR><IMG SRC="http://www.sonicsoftware.com/media/general/logos/sonic_logo1.gif"; VSPACE="10">
adr:;;14 Oak Park;Bedford;MA;01730;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:vice president & chief technology evangelist
fn:Dave Chappell
end:vcard