Karl:
 
You wrote:  “[A]nyspeculation based on combining the names of the patriarchs or 
those connectedwith them with Egyptian language from a millennium later is as 
silly as sayingthat because Old English had the word “sote”, that therefore the 
Spanishexplorer Hernando de Soto was English.”
 
Well, if you don’t like Egyptian, then let’s compare the AmarnaLetters written 
by the scribe of Hurrian princeling ruler IR-Heba of Jerusalem straightup with 
the Patriarchal narratives.
 
1.  XireqCompaginis 
 
Per Wm. Moran and RobertHendel (the latter in 2012), the only use of the 
archaic xireq compaginis in Amarna Letters from Canaan proper is byIR-Heba’s 
scribe.  Per Harvard professorScott C. Layton (in 1990), the only use of 
xireqcompaginis in non-poetic common words in the Hebrew Bible is in 
thePatriarchal narratives.
 
2.  “Ayalon” as 3-Syllable Name
 
IR-Heba’s scribe (unlikeAmarna Letter EA 273) writes “Ayalon” as a 3-syllable 
name at EA 287: 57.  So do the Patriarchal narratives at Genesis13: 18, 14: 13 
and 18: 1.  (Incidentally,that phrase in Genesis also uses xireqcompaginis.)
 
3.  HapaxLegomenon vs. Hurrian Common Words
 
I have identified four hapax legomenon in the Patriarchalnarratives (words that 
appear only in the Patriarchal narratives and notelsewhere in the Bible) that 
have baffled scholars, but which seem to beexplicable in terms of a close 
relationship to attested Hurrian common words.  IR-Heba’s scribe is virtually 
the only scribein greater Canaan who ever uses Hurrian common words.  For 
example, Wm. Moran views EN-ri at Amarna Letter EA 286: 7 asbeing the Hurrian 
common word eb-ri,where the first syllable in the Amarna Letter uses a 
logogram.  Irpiat Amarna Letter EA 289: 36 may be another version of this same 
Hurrian word,this time with the inversion of the consonants that was common at 
Nuzi.
 
4.  Milk-i-Ilu
 
IR-Heba’s Amarna Letterscomplain that the Amorite Milk-i-Ilu was allied with 
tent dwellers in Year 13.  Genesis 14: 13 confirms that Mamre theAmorite was 
allied with tent dwellers [the first Hebrews] in Year 13 [with thatdate 
referenced at Genesis 14: 4].  Mamrethe Amorite is an apt Patriarchal nickname 
for historical Milk-Ilu, whoseactual name is honored and set forth at Genesis 
46: 17:  MLK -Y-  )L [once again with a xireq compaginis].
 
5.  Hurrian Proper Names
 
“IR-Heba” itself is aHurrian name honoring the chief Hurrian goddess Heba.  
IR-Heba’s letters are filled with many otherHurrian proper names, because the 
Amarna Age was the only time when Hurrianprincelings like IR-Heba dominated the 
ruling class of Canaan.  The Patriarchal narratives likewise featuredozens of 
Hurrian proper names, more than all the rest of the books in theBible put 
together.  For example,consider these six Hurrian proper names at Genesis 15: 
19-21:  (i) Qa-a-ni-ya: QYNY  [KJV ‘Kenites’];  (ii) Qa-ni-zi-ya :  QNZY  
[‘Kenizzites’];  (iii) Xu-ti-ya : XTY  [‘Hittites’]; (iv) Piri-zi-ya  :  PRZY  
[Perizzites’];  (v) Gera-ge-$e-ya  :  GRG$Y  [‘Girgashites’];  and (vi) 
A-bu-u-se-ya :  YBWSY  [‘Jebusites’].
 
6.  Compare the Numbers 
 
As with many other AmarnaLetters, IR-Heba’s letters feature the phrase “7 + 7”, 
a notion that featuresprominently in the Patriarchal narratives:  Jacob’s 7 + 7 
years working for Laban, and the7+ 7 years of first feast then famine.  
IR-Heba’sAmarna Letter EA 287, per Moran’s footnote 18, uniquely features the 
number318, which is a classic Hurrian number.  (Forexample, Akhenaten’s father 
was sent 318 Hurrian women from Naharim:  1 princess bride and her 317 
retainers.)  That same Hurrian number 318 appears atGenesis 14: 15.
 
7.  Geographical Nomenclature
 
The only Amarna Letter fromsouthern Canaan that refers either to the Hurrian 
state of Mitanni in northernMesopotamia (eastern Syria) or to southern 
Mesopotamia is IR-Heba’s AmarnaLetter EA 288: 34-40.  Stunningly, 
thenomenclature “Naharim” matches Genesis 24: 10, and the nomenclature “land 
ofthe Kassites” matches Genesis 11: 28, 31.  
 
8.  Untoward Events at Shechem in Year 13
 
Amarna Letter EA 289: 18-24from IR-Heba sounds like a short summary of chapter 
34 of Genesis:  “Are we to act like Lab’ayu [Patriarchalnickname Hamor] when he 
was giving the land of Shechem to the Xapiru [tentdwellers]?”  If shanah is 
given the archaic meaning of a 6-month period when people’sages are set forth 
in the Patriarchal narratives, then it can be determinedthat the untoward 
events at Shechem in chapter 34 of Genesis, after Lab’ayu/Hamortried to ally 
with tent dwellers for nefarious purposes [in particular with ason of his 
consorting with tent dwellers], occur 13 tenfold [12-month] yearsafter 
Abraham’s birth.
 
9.  Firstborn Son Given the Shaft
 
7 of 7 firstborn sons inthe Patriarchal narratives get the shaft and properly 
so:  Haran, Lot, Ishmael, Esau, Reuben, Er,Manasseh.  That’s how IR-Heba 
himselfbecame the ruler of Jerusalem.  IR-Heba’sAmarna Letters suggest that 
pharaoh Akhenaten named IR-Heba, a younger son, asthe new ruler of Jerusalem 
over the objections of IR-Heba’s father, who wantedhis firstborn son to be his 
successor.  AmarnaLetter EA 286: 9-16 is analyzed as to IR-Heba in that way by 
Tom Ishida atp.155 in The Royal Dynasties in Ancient Israel (1977):
 
“The words imply that the Egyptian overlord[Akhenaten] intervened in the strife 
for the succession in the kingdom ofJerusalem.  As a result, the normalpractice 
that the king and queen-mother [of Jerusalem] designated theheir-apparent was 
overridden, and the Egyptian king appointed Abdi-heba to beking.  It is clear 
that he was a memberof the royal family of Jerusalem but his parents did not 
want to choose him asthe successor, presumably because of his inferior rank in 
the order ofsuccession.” 
 
Conclusion: IR-Heba’s Amarna Letters and the Patriarchal narratives share many 
keycharacteristics.  That reflects the factthat they were composed 
contemporaneously, in Years 13-14, and in virtually thesame geographical locale 
[south-central Canaan].  They’re coming from the same time invirtually the same 
place.  Though ofcourse with totally different viewpoints.
 
Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to