Nir: On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat. <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >>> Do you have other examples of where the plural of a feminine noun > ending> in a -H has the plural form > ending in -NYWT? Where are they found in Tanakh? > I know of none, that’s why I asked the question when the claim was apparently made. > > * > * >> >> > it is the normal way for a feminine noun ending in a -YH to become >> -YWT. and >> > if the last letter in N, so -NYH becomes -NYWT > > > > That was not my question. Are there other examples where a N was not the > final letter before the H, but inserted to make a -NYWT ending? > > but then no BH word follows the pattern you are looking for, > not even BYRNYT --> BYRNYWT where the N is already in the singular. > as opposed to BYRH --> BYRWT. > That’s why I understand that the two times BRNYWT is found in contexts that indicate that these are plural nouns, that they indicate that the singular noun BRNYH was in BH. This is a pattern that is found in Tanakh. > > nir cohen > Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
