Jim Stinehart:

You wrote: Genesis 37: 14 in fact says 
that the Patriarchs’ XBRWN is “a low tract of land of wide extent, fit 
for corn land…, and suited for battlefields” : (MQ.  Sadly, that geographical 
misunderstanding has prevented university scholars from seeing the one-to-one 
match between the world of IR-Heba’s Amarna Letters and the world of the 
Patriarchal narratives. 

Fascinating. I too question some conventionally accepted sites with places 
named in the biblical narratives. Have you considered that even tent-dwelling 
Asiatics living within and just outside Egypt's borders in Canaan may have been 
just educated enough to read and write hieratic? I find it a bit difficult to 
picture nomads moving about laden down with so many clay tablets in Akkadian. 
On the other hand, "Sinuhe" was presumably popular and perhaps available to 
them. Hebrew can be written in Akkadian cuneiform. It can also be written in 
hieratic, much easier. I would think if the patriarchal narratives were 
composed as early as the 14th century BC by "Hebrews" near Egypt, hieratic was 
the script used and parchment or leather was the writing material most of the 
time.


Tory Thorpe
Tel Aviv, Israel
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to