> > > > Its a bit like saying we'll design a transport system for able-bodied > people first (as they are the majority) - and gradually roll out to > others - this is also thought to be morally wrong, as well as a poor > design decision.
No - it's like designing a transport system, then later on adapting it so people who've cut their own legs off can use it. Using analogies to argue this point is like using a fish to power a nuclear reactor. :-) Cheers, Rich.
