I stand corrected. Concerning Corporation X, I should have said "without attribution and without source code".
Sean On Jan 19, 2008 2:22 PM, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 19/01/2008, Sean DALY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it's "public domain" then, which is fine > > The public domain exists in the UK only for works that have expired > from copyright; its only in the USA that you can legally assign a work > into the public domain before its term expires. Thus Creative Commons > recently retracted its "PD" license in favor of "CC 0". > > > as long as you don't > > mind Corporation X incorporating and selling your code. > > The GPL doesn't prohibit Corporation X incorporating and selling your code. > > -- > Regards, > Dave > > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial list archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
