On 26/03/2008, Tom Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tell you, there's a big pot of money awaiting someone who develops a > trusted-enough tracker for usage of online video (a big recruited > online panel running background tracking software might even do...) > > after all, it can hardly be *less* reliable than BARB, let alone RAJAR...
Even Kelvin MacKenzie is smart enough to see that the RAJAR figures are, let's say "pretend". On 26/03/2008, Sean DALY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had some background discussions with PACT while preparing my > > interview with Ashley and what I learned (unsurprisingly) is that > > rights holders want to be compensated; the actual method is up for > > discussion. They hear that DRM doesn't work or is ineffective, but > > they don't see an alternative. Pooling schemes hit a roadblock: many > > rights holders hope to have a very successful creation and be > > compensated for that far over and above what other rights holders > > might earn. I believe that tracking viewing (and by that I mean > > anonymised aggregates, not Phormlike snooping) is probably key to > > eliminating DRM. > > > > > > Sean. > > > > - > > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, > please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial > list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please > visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. > Unofficial > list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > -- Please email me back if you need any more help. Brian Butterworth http://www.ukfree.tv
