Bryan Penney wrote:
> The original document I quoted was for an older version, but I found 
> one for 2.9.1 and is still says it doesn't understand hardlinks
>
> http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison//download/releases/unison-2.9.1/unison-manual.pdf
>  
>
>
> I've copied a much smaller pool (150GB) using rsync when we first went 
> to a production server.
>
> Both of the servers have 2GB of RAM.
> After I get the drives for the new server, I will try rsync.  It will 
> be interesting to see how long it takes to copy all of this data with 
> all of those hardlinks.
>
> thanks for the help.
>
> Bryan
>
>
>
> On 12/28/2007 4:50 PM, dan wrote:
>> no it wouldnt, but i though it did.  is that statement for an older 
>> version?  it may just not handle it.  rsync should work if you have 
>> enough RAM
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2007 3:10 PM, Bryan Penney < [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>
>>     In reading about Unison I found a statement in the Caveats and
>>     Shortcomings section that said "Unison does not understand hard 
>> links"
>>
>>     If this is true, would Unison work in this situation?
>>
>>     On 12/28/2007 2:28 PM, dan wrote:
>>     > no, you will have to copy the entire 'pool' or 'cpool' over.  you
>>     > could copy individual pc backups, BUT when backuppc nightly 
>> runs it
>>     > will remove any hardlinks from the pool that are not needed
>>     > elsewhere.  when you copy over pc backups after that, the will
>>     not use
>>     > hardlinks and so your filesystem usage will go up a lot.  i
>>     would very
>>     > much suggest you do it all in one shot.
>>     >
>>     > i know that time is against you on this and that 2TB even over
>>     gigabit
>>     > is 5 hours so i would suggest that you rsync the files over 
>> once and
>>     > leave your other machine up running backups, then once it has
>>     > finished, turn backups off and rsync the source to the target
>>     again.
>>     > then you will have the bulk of the data over and only have to pull
>>     > changes.  i worry about the  file count for 2TB being too much for
>>     > rsync so consider Unison for the transfers.  In my reading i have
>>     > found that though unison has the same issue as rsync(same
>>     algorythms)
>>     > for a high number for files, it can handle more files in less
>>     memory.
>>     >
>>     > I have done this method to push about 800GB over and it worked
>>     well,
>>     > but my backup server has 2GB of RAM and runs gigabit.
>>     >
>>     > maybe consider adding some network interfaces and channel bonding
>>     > them.  i dont know if you have parts lying around but channel
>>     bonding
>>     > in linux is pretty easy and you have agrigate each NICs 
>> bandwidth to
>>     > reduce that transfer time though i suspect that your drives are 
>> not
>>     > much faster than 1 gigabit NIC so you might not get much 
>> benefit on
>>     > gigabit.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On Dec 28, 2007 10:17 AM, Bryan Penney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>     > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >     We have a server running BackupPC that has filled up it's 2TB
>>     >      partition
>>     >     (96% full anyway).  We are planning on moving BackupPC to
>>     another
>>     >     server
>>     >     but would like bring the history of backups over without
>>     waiting the
>>     >     extended period of time (days?) for the entire pool to copy.
>>      Is there
>>     >     any way to copy "pieces" of the pool, maybe per PC, at a
>>     time?  This
>>     >     would allow us to migrate over the course of a few weeks 
>> without
>>     >     having
>>     >     days at a time with no backups.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >        
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>>
>>     >     This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>>     >     Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>>     >     http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>>     <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/>
>>     >     _______________________________________________
>>     >     BackupPC-users mailing list
>>     >     [email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>     >     List:
>>     >       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>>     >     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users>>
>>     >     Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
>>     >     Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>>     <http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/>
>>     >     <http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/>
>>     >
>>     >
>>
>>
>
a long time.  you got gigabit?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to