The pool consists of about 3.8 million files, so there are a lot of 
small files.

On 12/28/2007 5:37 PM, dan wrote:
> then you should be able to rsync that accross in 4 or 5 hours.  is it 
> mostly large files or small files?  if it is large files then you 
> should be fine, but a ton of small files might be rough.  just give it 
> a shot, only way to know for sure :)
>
> On Dec 28, 2007 4:29 PM, Bryan Penney <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Yeah we will have them plugged into the same gigabit switch.
>
>     On 12/28/2007 5:17 PM, Daniel Denson wrote:
>     > Bryan Penney wrote:
>     >> The original document I quoted was for an older version, but I
>     found
>     >> one for 2.9.1 and is still says it doesn't understand hardlinks
>     >>
>     >>
>     
> http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison//download/releases/unison-2.9.1/unison-manual.pdf
>     
> <http://www.seas.upenn.edu/%7Ebcpierce/unison//download/releases/unison-2.9.1/unison-manual.pdf>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> I've copied a much smaller pool (150GB) using rsync when we first
>     >> went to a production server.
>     >>
>     >> Both of the servers have 2GB of RAM.
>     >> After I get the drives for the new server, I will try rsync.
>      It will
>     >> be interesting to see how long it takes to copy all of this
>     data with
>     >> all of those hardlinks.
>     >>
>     >> thanks for the help.
>     >>
>     >> Bryan
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> On 12/28/2007 4:50 PM, dan wrote:
>     >>> no it wouldnt, but i though it did.  is that statement for an
>     older
>     >>> version?  it may just not handle it.  rsync should work if you
>     have
>     >>> enough RAM
>     >>>
>     >>> On Dec 28, 2007 3:10 PM, Bryan Penney < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>     >>>
>     >>>     In reading about Unison I found a statement in the Caveats and
>     >>>     Shortcomings section that said "Unison does not understand
>     hard
>     >>> links"
>     >>>
>     >>>     If this is true, would Unison work in this situation?
>     >>>
>     >>>     On 12/28/2007 2:28 PM, dan wrote:
>     >>>     > no, you will have to copy the entire 'pool' or 'cpool'
>     over.  you
>     >>>     > could copy individual pc backups, BUT when backuppc nightly
>     >>> runs it
>     >>>     > will remove any hardlinks from the pool that are not needed
>     >>>     > elsewhere.  when you copy over pc backups after that,
>     the will
>     >>>     not use
>     >>>     > hardlinks and so your filesystem usage will go up a lot.  i
>     >>>     would very
>     >>>     > much suggest you do it all in one shot.
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > i know that time is against you on this and that 2TB
>     even over
>     >>>     gigabit
>     >>>     > is 5 hours so i would suggest that you rsync the files over
>     >>> once and
>     >>>     > leave your other machine up running backups, then once
>     it has
>     >>>     > finished, turn backups off and rsync the source to the
>     target
>     >>>     again.
>     >>>     > then you will have the bulk of the data over and only
>     have to
>     >>> pull
>     >>>     > changes.  i worry about the  file count for 2TB being
>     too much
>     >>> for
>     >>>     > rsync so consider Unison for the transfers.  In my
>     reading i have
>     >>>     > found that though unison has the same issue as rsync(same
>     >>>     algorythms)
>     >>>     > for a high number for files, it can handle more files in
>     less
>     >>>     memory.
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > I have done this method to push about 800GB over and it
>     worked
>     >>>     well,
>     >>>     > but my backup server has 2GB of RAM and runs gigabit.
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > maybe consider adding some network interfaces and
>     channel bonding
>     >>>     > them.  i dont know if you have parts lying around but
>     channel
>     >>>     bonding
>     >>>     > in linux is pretty easy and you have agrigate each NICs
>     >>> bandwidth to
>     >>>     > reduce that transfer time though i suspect that your drives
>     >>> are not
>     >>>     > much faster than 1 gigabit NIC so you might not get much
>     >>> benefit on
>     >>>     > gigabit.
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     > On Dec 28, 2007 10:17 AM, Bryan Penney <
>     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     >>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>     >>>     > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     >     We have a server running BackupPC that has filled up
>     it's 2TB
>     >>>     >      partition
>     >>>     >     (96% full anyway).  We are planning on moving
>     BackupPC to
>     >>>     another
>     >>>     >     server
>     >>>     >     but would like bring the history of backups over
>     without
>     >>>     waiting the
>     >>>     >     extended period of time (days?) for the entire pool
>     to copy.
>     >>>      Is there
>     >>>     >     any way to copy "pieces" of the pool, maybe per PC,
>     at a
>     >>>     time?  This
>     >>>     >     would allow us to migrate over the course of a few weeks
>     >>> without
>     >>>     >     having
>     >>>     >     days at a time with no backups.
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     >
>     >>>
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>>     >     This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>     >>>     >     Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>     >>>     >     http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>     >>>     <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>     <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/>>
>     >>>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >>>     >     BackupPC-users mailing list
>     >>>     >     [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >>>     <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >>>     >     <mailto: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >>>     <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >>>     >     List:
>     >>>     >      
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>     >>>     >     <
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>     >>>    
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users>>>
>     >>>     >     Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
>     >>>     >     Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>     >>>     <http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/>
>     >>>     >     < http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/>
>     >>>     >
>     >>>     >
>     >>>
>     >>>
>     >>
>     > a long time.  you got gigabit?
>     >
>     >
>     >
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to