I have to agree with the suggestions to turn up the new server and let the
old one stay up for a while.  at some point you can just pick some specific
full backups and do a tgz or zip dump to tape or DVD for long term storage
and flip the power off.

On Dec 28, 2007 7:39 PM, John Pettitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Bryan Penney wrote:
> > The pool consists of about 3.8 million files, so there are a lot of
> > small files.
> >
>
> My experience when I had to do this on one of my servers was that it's
> not the pool itself that kills you it's linking all the directory trees
> from the pc directories.    The box I was using could link 500 files a
> second but it still too five days to complete.
>
> Unless you need to take the old server out of service I'd suggest just
> making all the hosts backup disabled and then letting the new server
> build it's own history.  Wait three months then take the old server down.
>
> John
> > On 12/28/2007 5:37 PM, dan wrote:
> >
> >> then you should be able to rsync that accross in 4 or 5 hours.  is it
> >> mostly large files or small files?  if it is large files then you
> >> should be fine, but a ton of small files might be rough.  just give it
> >> a shot, only way to know for sure :)
> >>
> >> On Dec 28, 2007 4:29 PM, Bryan Penney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     Yeah we will have them plugged into the same gigabit switch.
> >>
> >>     On 12/28/2007 5:17 PM, Daniel Denson wrote:
> >>     > Bryan Penney wrote:
> >>     >> The original document I quoted was for an older version, but I
> >>     found
> >>     >> one for 2.9.1 and is still says it doesn't understand hardlinks
> >>     >>
> >>     >>
> >>
> http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison//download/releases/unison-2.9.1/unison-manual.pdf<http://www.seas.upenn.edu/%7Ebcpierce/unison//download/releases/unison-2.9.1/unison-manual.pdf>
> >>     <
> http://www.seas.upenn.edu/%7Ebcpierce/unison//download/releases/unison-2.9.1/unison-manual.pdf
> >
> >>     >>
> >>     >>
> >>     >> I've copied a much smaller pool (150GB) using rsync when we
> first
> >>     >> went to a production server.
> >>     >>
> >>     >> Both of the servers have 2GB of RAM.
> >>     >> After I get the drives for the new server, I will try rsync.
> >>      It will
> >>     >> be interesting to see how long it takes to copy all of this
> >>     data with
> >>     >> all of those hardlinks.
> >>     >>
> >>     >> thanks for the help.
> >>     >>
> >>     >> Bryan
> >>     >>
> >>     >>
> >>     >>
> >>     >> On 12/28/2007 4:50 PM, dan wrote:
> >>     >>> no it wouldnt, but i though it did.  is that statement for an
> >>     older
> >>     >>> version?  it may just not handle it.  rsync should work if you
> >>     have
> >>     >>> enough RAM
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>> On Dec 28, 2007 3:10 PM, Bryan Penney < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>     >>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>>     In reading about Unison I found a statement in the Caveats
> and
> >>     >>>     Shortcomings section that said "Unison does not understand
> >>     hard
> >>     >>> links"
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>>     If this is true, would Unison work in this situation?
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>>     On 12/28/2007 2:28 PM, dan wrote:
> >>     >>>     > no, you will have to copy the entire 'pool' or 'cpool'
> >>     over.  you
> >>     >>>     > could copy individual pc backups, BUT when backuppc
> nightly
> >>     >>> runs it
> >>     >>>     > will remove any hardlinks from the pool that are not
> needed
> >>     >>>     > elsewhere.  when you copy over pc backups after that,
> >>     the will
> >>     >>>     not use
> >>     >>>     > hardlinks and so your filesystem usage will go up a lot.
>  i
> >>     >>>     would very
> >>     >>>     > much suggest you do it all in one shot.
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     > i know that time is against you on this and that 2TB
> >>     even over
> >>     >>>     gigabit
> >>     >>>     > is 5 hours so i would suggest that you rsync the files
> over
> >>     >>> once and
> >>     >>>     > leave your other machine up running backups, then once
> >>     it has
> >>     >>>     > finished, turn backups off and rsync the source to the
> >>     target
> >>     >>>     again.
> >>     >>>     > then you will have the bulk of the data over and only
> >>     have to
> >>     >>> pull
> >>     >>>     > changes.  i worry about the  file count for 2TB being
> >>     too much
> >>     >>> for
> >>     >>>     > rsync so consider Unison for the transfers.  In my
> >>     reading i have
> >>     >>>     > found that though unison has the same issue as rsync(same
> >>     >>>     algorythms)
> >>     >>>     > for a high number for files, it can handle more files in
> >>     less
> >>     >>>     memory.
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     > I have done this method to push about 800GB over and it
> >>     worked
> >>     >>>     well,
> >>     >>>     > but my backup server has 2GB of RAM and runs gigabit.
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     > maybe consider adding some network interfaces and
> >>     channel bonding
> >>     >>>     > them.  i dont know if you have parts lying around but
> >>     channel
> >>     >>>     bonding
> >>     >>>     > in linux is pretty easy and you have agrigate each NICs
> >>     >>> bandwidth to
> >>     >>>     > reduce that transfer time though i suspect that your
> drives
> >>     >>> are not
> >>     >>>     > much faster than 1 gigabit NIC so you might not get much
> >>     >>> benefit on
> >>     >>>     > gigabit.
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     > On Dec 28, 2007 10:17 AM, Bryan Penney <
> >>     [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>     >>>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >>     >>>     > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     >     We have a server running BackupPC that has filled up
> >>     it's 2TB
> >>     >>>     >      partition
> >>     >>>     >     (96% full anyway).  We are planning on moving
> >>     BackupPC to
> >>     >>>     another
> >>     >>>     >     server
> >>     >>>     >     but would like bring the history of backups over
> >>     without
> >>     >>>     waiting the
> >>     >>>     >     extended period of time (days?) for the entire pool
> >>     to copy.
> >>     >>>      Is there
> >>     >>>     >     any way to copy "pieces" of the pool, maybe per PC,
> >>     at a
> >>     >>>     time?  This
> >>     >>>     >     would allow us to migrate over the course of a few
> weeks
> >>     >>> without
> >>     >>>     >     having
> >>     >>>     >     days at a time with no backups.
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>>     >     This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> >>     >>>     >     Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >>     >>>     >
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >>     >>>     <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >>     <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/>>
> >>     >>>     >     _______________________________________________
> >>     >>>     >     BackupPC-users mailing list
> >>     >>>     >     [email protected]
> >>     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>     >>>     <mailto:[email protected]
> >>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>     >>>     >     <mailto: [email protected]
> >>     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>     >>>     <mailto:[email protected]
> >>     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
> >>     >>>     >     List:
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> >>     >>>     >     <
> >>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> >>     >>>
> >>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> >>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users>>>
> >>     >>>     >     Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> >>     >>>     >     Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
> >>     >>>     <http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/>
> >>     >>>     >     < http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/>
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>     >
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>>
> >>     >>
> >>     > a long time.  you got gigabit?
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>     >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > BackupPC-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> > Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
> >
> >
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to