What I would do is this: Setup backuppc for company A at the company B location Setup backuppc for company B at the company A location
That way you will have total failover redundancy with no "lost weeks". So if say Company A "burns" or is robbed, etc you have the backup of the servers at company B location and vise versa. This way you are maximizing your protection. And you don't have to rely on "sneakernet" to transfer the drives. Everything is automagic. This nearly eliminates human interference. With this setup I would stagger the full backups to different days though. On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Inno <in...@voila.fr> wrote: > I will test it (but I want a full backup every week). We have a connection > with 250 KB/s. > > My goal is not to centralize backups so I wondered if my solution will be > good. > > Imagine if the company burns or HDD breaks. For me it's better to have two > HDD (at different locations) with a loss of one week if its burn. Do you > understand why I want exchange between both every week and why I imagine > this steps ? (maybe I'm not clear :-S) > > Thanks. > > > Message du 04/05/10 à 15h23 > > De : "Kameleon" <kameleo...@gmail.com> > > A : "General list for user discussion,<br> questions and support" < > backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Copie à : > > Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup > > > > This is very true. We have 4 remote sites, 2 T1's (1.5megabit up and > down) > > and 2 DSL (1.5megabit down x 256 kilobit up) and have a central backuppc > > server located in-house that backs up those 4 server and 10 more in house > on > > the local fiber network. The only issue was the initial full on the 2 DSL > > connections. Since they are local to us, I was able to take the server > there > > and run the initial full no problem. I use rsync on all the servers. The > > total of all the servers is over 2TB with the remote sites having about > > 700GB of that. So you should be good with rsync and just get the initial > > full onsite. > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Inno wrote: > > > > I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than 500 > GB. > > > > > > > > > > With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial copy > > > (which > > > you might take on-site and carry over or let it run over a weekend). > The > > > bandwidth/time you need nightly would depend on the rate of change in > the > > > content. > > > > > > -- > > > Les Mikesell > > > lesmikes...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > BackupPC-users mailing list > > > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > > > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > > > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > > > > [ (pas de nom de fichier) (0.1 Ko) ] > > [ (pas de nom de fichier) (0.3 Ko) ] > > ____________________________________________________ > > Suivez toute l'actualité de la Nouvelle Star, retrouvez les dépêches, les > photos et les vidéos : > http://evenementiel.voila.fr/Nouvelle-Star-2010/infos > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > BackupPC-users mailing list > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
