250k is plenty for this scenario. We run nightly incrementals with weekly fulls on all of our servers including the 4 remote sites. The 2 slowest of our remotes are 256k up and that is still sufficient pending you don't have alot of data change.
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Inno <in...@voila.fr> wrote: > It's a very good idea. But with this solution I am forced to do a single > full then incrementals. And I'm not sure the speed of upload will be > sufficient. > > And configure BackupPC with : > FullPeriod = -1 > FullKeepCnt = 1 > FullKeepCntMin = 1 > FullAgeMax = 90 > -- > IncrPeriod = 1 > IncrKeepCnt = 8 > IncrKeepCntMin = 4 > IncrAgeMax = 30 > IncrLevels = 1, 2, 3, 4 > -- > > If your solution is not possible, do you think mine will work without > create problem in BackupPC ? > > Tanks a lot. > > > > > Message du 04/05/10 à 16h15 > > De : "Kameleon" <kameleo...@gmail.com> > > A : in...@voila.fr, "General list for user discussion, questions and > support" <backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Copie à : > > Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup > > > > What I would do is this: > > > > Setup backuppc for company A at the company B location > > Setup backuppc for company B at the company A location > > > > That way you will have total failover redundancy with no "lost weeks". So > if > > say Company A "burns" or is robbed, etc you have the backup of the > servers > > at company B location and vise versa. This way you are maximizing your > > protection. And you don't have to rely on "sneakernet" to transfer the > > drives. Everything is automagic. This nearly eliminates human > interference. > > With this setup I would stagger the full backups to different days > though. > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Inno <in...@voila.fr> wrote: > > > > > I will test it (but I want a full backup every week). We have a > connection > > > with 250 KB/s. > > > > > > My goal is not to centralize backups so I wondered if my solution will > be > > > good. > > > > > > Imagine if the company burns or HDD breaks. For me it's better to have > two > > > HDD (at different locations) with a loss of one week if its burn. Do > you > > > understand why I want exchange between both every week and why I > imagine > > > this steps ? (maybe I'm not clear :-S) > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > Message du 04/05/10 à 15h23 > > > > De : "Kameleon" <kameleo...@gmail.com> > > > > A : "General list for user discussion,<br> questions and support" > < > > > backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > > > > Copie à : > > > > Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup > > > > > > > > This is very true. We have 4 remote sites, 2 T1's (1.5megabit up and > > > down) > > > > and 2 DSL (1.5megabit down x 256 kilobit up) and have a central > backuppc > > > > server located in-house that backs up those 4 server and 10 more in > house > > > on > > > > the local fiber network. The only issue was the initial full on the 2 > DSL > > > > connections. Since they are local to us, I was able to take the > server > > > there > > > > and run the initial full no problem. I use rsync on all the servers. > The > > > > total of all the servers is over 2TB with the remote sites having > about > > > > 700GB of that. So you should be good with rsync and just get the > initial > > > > full onsite. > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Inno wrote: > > > > > > I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than > 500 > > > GB. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial > copy > > > > > (which > > > > > you might take on-site and carry over or let it run over a > weekend). > > > The > > > > > bandwidth/time you need nightly would depend on the rate of change > in > > > the > > > > > content. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Les Mikesell > > > > > lesmikes...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > BackupPC-users mailing list > > > > > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > > List: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > > > > > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > > > > > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ (pas de nom de fichier) (0.1 Ko) ] > > > > [ (pas de nom de fichier) (0.3 Ko) ] > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > > > > > > Suivez toute l'actualité de la Nouvelle Star, retrouvez les dépêches, > les > > > photos et les vidéos : > > > http://evenementiel.voila.fr/Nouvelle-Star-2010/infos > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > BackupPC-users mailing list > > > BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net > > > List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users > > > Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net > > > Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > > Suivez toute l'actualité de la Nouvelle Star, retrouvez les dépêches, les > photos et les vidéos : > http://evenementiel.voila.fr/Nouvelle-Star-2010/infos > > > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
