On 5/4/2010 8:55 AM, Inno wrote:
> I will test it (but I want a full backup every week). We have a connection
> with 250 KB/s.
>
> My goal is not to centralize backups so I wondered if my solution will be
> good.
>
> Imagine if the company burns or HDD breaks. For me it's better to have two
> HDD (at different locations) with a loss of one week if its burn. Do you
> understand why I want exchange between both every week and why I imagine this
> steps ? (maybe I'm not clear :-S)
What I'm suggesting is that you have two complete servers, each backing
up both locations, and probably nightly instead of weekly if you have
the usual amount of idle time at night. Assuming that it works (which
will depend on the size of the daily incremental change) you'll have a
system that takes care of itself without intervention, covers the
disaster scenario with less data lost, and you'll also cover the even
more likely problems where someone accidentally erases a file and wants
it back the next morning.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
