2016-01-14 23:00 GMT+01:00 Adam Goryachev <mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au>: > I would suggest anyone considering BPC should use v3 unless they > specifically need the v4 features, and even then, are prepared for the > possible shortcomings inherent in using alpha software.
I can't use v3 because i'm having servers with millions of file to be transfered and v3 takes ages in "Building files list". v4 uses native rsync and incremental file list. This is faster, transfer start immediatly, not after many many hours. BTW, 1 server was backuped properly, now is running "fsck #0". As I understood from docs, BackupPC should not run when fsck in running. I'm having a full dump of srv1, and srv2 that is doing "fsck #0". Is this bad or fsck can be run parallel with other backups? Usually how long does it take to complete? this is slowing down the other backup that seems to be frozen. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
