Am 28.10.2016 um 18:45 schrieb Gandalf Corvotempesta: > 2016-10-28 17:36 GMT+02:00 Alain Mouette <ala...@bonseletrons.com.br>: >> Please, I went reading about rsnapshot and it also makes extensive use of >> hard-links, does it perform differently than BackupPC about this?
> rsnapshot is much faster than BackupPC because it hasn't to do any > check in the pool > No deduplication or compression, thus it will run a plain rsync at > maximum speed. I'm quite happy with borgbackup as a secondary backup method aside BackupPC and wouldn't go back to rsnapshot and alike. Borgbackup is IMO fast, does deduplication, compression encryption with relatively little effort -- even offsite. And its "pool" of chunks is quite easy to copy. I didn't try borg-rsyncimport which is advertised as "can import existing rsync+hardlink or rsnapshot based backups into a borgbackup repository." Nonetheless I wouldn't want to miss BackupPC. Regards, Benjamin -- FSU Jena | JULIELab.de/Staff/Benjamin+Redling.html vox: +49 3641 9 44323 | fax: +49 3641 9 44321 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise? Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy! http://sdm.link/telerik _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
