Hello, pon., 28 wrz 2020 o 14:34 Ben Laurie <b...@links.org> napisał(a):
> > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 18:58, Josip Deanovic <djosip+n...@linuxpages.net> > wrote: > >> On Sunday 2020-09-13 15:43:31 Ben Laurie wrote: >> > > Not sure if IgnoreCase option could caused it somehow. >> > >> > According to the documentation it just makes it ignore case for pattern >> > matching, so seems unlikely? >> >> I can't say because I didn't use Bacula with Windows a lot. >> It worked fine back in 2010-2012. >> >> > Yes, funny I somehow had not noticed that before - I've added it. I >> > presume it won't fix this problem, tho. >> >> No, but it will make the difference for future backups. >> > > I tried using accurate but it just caused errors (I forget what now, but > some problem with database searches?). > > In other news, I did a full restore as a test recently and I got quite a > few errors along the lines of: > > 25-Sep 14:46 xxx-fd JobId 35: Error: File /tmp/bacula-restores/k/xxx > already exists and could not be replaced. ERR=Permission denied. > First of all to properly restore Windows files on any Linux or Unix machine you have to set a Portable flag for your backup. With Portable=no (which is a default) Bacula will backup Windows files using Windows API calls which are not strictly portable to Linux/Unix read/write. This could explain the backup/restore sizes. Additionally above "Permission denied" errors are extremely strange and could directly influence your restore. This could additionally explain the backup/restore sizes. best regards -- Radosław Korzeniewski rados...@korzeniewski.net
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
