On 10/27/05, Susan Maneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "In this particular context, the way you are trying to redefine things
> is inappropriate to the larger issue. The issue of genocide came up in
> the contex of talking about how moral decisions can be made based on
> constant ethical values and principles. And in that context, I said
> that the Biblical genocides were clearly wrong."
> Dear Gilberto,
> I'm suggesting that your basic thesis is wrong.
What do you think my thesis is?
> The fact of the matter is that we dont' know much about which > ethical
> values have been constant over history and whether or > not the Israelites
> received a commandment to kill these people.
What do you even mean by that. If you aren't even sure if the
Israelites received those commands (which are clearly contained in
Deuteronomy) why argue tooth-and-nail that those commandments are
justified? If you really aren't claiming to know you should have said
that in the beginning.
> Nor do I think we can project our present day values back on
> Biblical times anymore than I think we should project them
> back on Qur'anic times.
I would say that a set of values worthy of the name "values" actually
*can* be applied that way. However, those values can be applied in
ways which are sensitive to different situations and circumstances
which may have existed in different societies.
> The truth is that our concept of what constitutes genocide has
> changed over time and by modern standards Muhammad would > have been as
> guilty of genocide as the people of the OT.
Firstly, you are still ignoring the point. I specifically explained
what I meant by genocide and what I am refering to as "genocide" for
the purposes of this particular discussion is different from what was
done to Banu Qurayzah.
Secondly, You are totally ignoring the explanation given by Karen
Armstrong. There are specific reasons for why the particular actions
taken against Banu Qurayzah saved lives. The basic principle, the
basic value which is being applied in that situation is the idea of
self-defense.
Thirdly, please don't ever ever say that you love and respect Islam
and Muhammad if you are going to equate Muhammad with Milosevic.
-Gilberto
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail")
is sent by the Johnson County Community College ("JCCC") and is intended to be
confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. The
information may be protected by federal and state privacy and disclosures acts
or other legal rules. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail
in error please immediately notify JCCC by email reply and immediately and
permanently delete this e-mail message and any attachments thereto. Thank you.
__________________________________________________
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected]
Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st
Baha'i Studies is available through the following:
Mail - mailto:[email protected]
Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st
News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st
Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist
Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
