[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The Guardian asserted that Abdu'l-Baha had supernatural knowledge. He didn't say He was omniscient, however. Dear Susan, Could you please elaborate on some of the ideas you presented? How do we understand supernatural knowledge as distinct from omniscience? How do we distinguish between supernatural knowledge and scientific errors in Abdul-Baha's writings? If infallibility isn't about propositional inerrancy, how is it defined? Why do some Bahais believe in the literal infallibility of every statement of Abdul-Baha (What is the scriptural authority for this?)? Marleen
__________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected] Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:[email protected] Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Public - http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] |
- Re: Science and Religion M Chase
- Re: Science and Religion M Chase
- Re: Science and Religion firestorm
- Re: Science and Religion smaneck
- Re: Science and Religion Iskandar Hai
- Re: Science and Religion smaneck
- Re: Science and Religion M Chase
- Re: Science and Religion Albert
- Re: Science and Religion Ursus Maximus
- Re: Science and Religion M Chase
- Re: Science and Religion M Chase
- Re: Science and Religion smaneck
- Re: Science and Religion smaneck
- Re: Science and Religion smaneck
- Re: Science and Religion Dean Betts
- Re: Science and Religion smaneck
- Re: Science and Religion firestorm
- Re: Science and Religion M Chase
- Re: Science and Religion Albert
- Re: Science and Religion Iskandar Hai
- Re: Science and Religion smaneck
