The Baha'i Studies Listserv > My problem is, it seems to me that most Baha'is including famous ones who > speak at Conferences and etc. probably do not find my understanding > acceptable. This obviously worries me.
Dear Ron, I think we've discussed this issue many times before. They may not share your understanding but I think they are *at least* as tolerant of your beliefs as you are of theirs. > > Maybe this concept of 'plenary inerrancy not applying' can help me. But is a > belief that our Central Figures including the Universal House of Justice > don't have plenary inerrancy, is that acceptable to the Administration, do > you think? The members of the House of Justice with whom I discussed Udo Schaeffer's article on infallibility said they welcomed this kind of discussion. In other words, if a person were known to have this belief, could > they be expelled as say for instance Sen McGlinn was? Views on Infallibility had nothing to do with why Sen McGlinn was removed from the rolls. If you doubt me on this subject I very much urge you to discuss the matter with Gene Andrews who I am sure would be happy to explain it to you. warmest, Susan __________________________________________________ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[email protected] Unsubscribe: send a blank email to mailto:[email protected] Subscribe: send subscribe bahai-st in the message body to [email protected] Or subscribe: http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=bahai-st Baha'i Studies is available through the following: Mail - mailto:[email protected] Web - http://list.jccc.edu:8080/read/?forum=bahai-st News (on-campus only) - news://list.jccc.edu/bahai-st Old Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] New Public - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
