Dear Mark, In your response to William: <>You are using the term "literalism" differently than I am.<> Got me thinking this is probably why sometimes your comments leave me with more questions than answers... ;- )
Reflecting on other views you've expressed (my past experience) is it more accurate to say that your usage of the word "literalism" is more closely related to "realism" in the sense of observable facts without idealization ? My question would then be how can an individual or a society evolve progressively without some form of idealization or vision of what might be as opposed to what has been ? I have other questions concerning the relationship of gestalt to sociology as opposed to psychology. But, I'm off to a busy day culminating in a jazz concert that I've been anticipating for weeks! I was raised in Kansas City, (MO) remember... Lovingly, Sandra ---------- You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Baha'i Studies is available through the following: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.jccc.net/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=bahai-st news://list.jccc.net/bahai-st http://www.escribe.com/religion/bahaist (public) http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] (public)
