Ntar di bantu terjemahannya ya om. Lg di jalan nih... :)

Powered by Telkomsel BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: robert marlino <[email protected]>

Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:56:30 
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [baleno] <SHARING> "The Port and Polishing Myth"


thulong bantuin dunkzzzz.....
buathin terjemahan na......
skedar nambah pengetahuan aje.....
sual kebenaran na......
terganthung tuner mesin masing2 yachhh....
meth baca yachhh......

cmiiw, thapi yachhh.....

It is popularly held that enlarging the ports to the maximum possible
size and applying a mirror finish is what porting is. However that is
not so. Some ports may be enlarged to their maximum possible size (in
keeping with the highest level of aerodynamic efficiency) but those
engines are highly developed very high speed units where the actual
size of the ports has become a restriction. Often the size of the port
is reducedto increase power. A mirror finish of the
port does not provide the increase that intuition would suggest. In
fact, within intake systems, the surface is usually deliberately
textured to a degree of uniform roughness to encourage fuel deposited
on the port walls to evaporate quickly. A rough surface on selected
areas of the port may also alter flow by energizing the boundary layer, which 
can alter the flow path noticeably, possibly increasing flow. This is similar 
to what the dimples on a golf balldo. Flow bench testing shows that the 
difference between a mirror finished intake port
and a rough textured port is typically less than 1%. The difference
between a smooth to the touch port and an optically mirrored surface is
not measurable by ordinary means. Exhaust ports may be smooth finished
because of the dry gas flow and in the interest of minimizing exhaust
by-product build-up. A 300 - 400 Grit finish followed by a light buff
is generally accepted to be representative of a near optimal finish for
exhaust gas ports.
The reason that polished ports are not
advantageous from a flow standpoint is that at the interface between
the metal wall and the air, the air speed is ZERO (see boundary layer and 
laminar flow). This is due to the wetting action of the air and indeed all 
fluids. The first layer of molecules
adheres to the wall and does not move significantly. The rest of the
flow field must shear past which develops a velocity profile (or
gradient) across the duct. In order for surface roughness to impact
flow appreciably, the high spots must be high enough to protrude into
the faster moving air toward the center. Only a very rough surface does this.


      Yahoo! Mail Kini Lebih Cepat dan Lebih Bersih. Rasakan bedanya sekarang! 
http://id.mail.yahoo.com

Kirim email ke