On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:10 +0200, david blanchard wrote: > What I was trying to say is that people who don't want to be spoiled > can do so. The information remains public but people can chose to > access it or not. So we do define different groups but people are free > to join them. > For this I guess we'll be creating specific mailing lists so that > people can decide to subscribe or not.
Yes, or put [Spoiler] tags in the subject for example. > [David] I think I'm more or less ok with all of this. I'll rework the > social contract with this and with our yesterday's discussion in mind, > and we'll see how it goes. > Basically I think I'll do it this way : > - the social contract is written by the committee, not by the studio. > - the social contract defines the rules to be followed by all > stakeholders within the community. The studio is one of them. > - There will be a dedicated part that specifies the rules to be > followed by the studio as a member of the community. > - This way, the social contract bonds the company as a member of the > community, not per se. So, in 5 years from now, if big bad evil > investors have the control over the studio and want to change its > organization, the divorce can happen between the community and the > studio without damaging too much both of them. Of course, this should > not happen as long as the founders have control over the studio, given > our belief that it will be thanks to the community that the studio can > become successful (and vice versa). But, extreme questions require > extreme answers... Sounds good to me - let's see how we can write down the nasty details now : ) Xavier. _______________________________________________ Hackit Bar mailing list - [email protected] Wiki: http://community.hackit.cx/ List: http://community.hackit.cx/ml/ Forum: http://community.hackit.cx/forum/ Ideas: http://community.hackit.cx/ideas/ IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#politis
