On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 09:29 +0200, david blanchard wrote: > > Sounds good to me - let's see how we can write down the nasty details > > now : ) > > > > Xavier. > > > > [David] I've reviewed the social contract following our conversation. > You can check it here (http://community.hackit.cx/wiki/Social_Contract ) and > the diff here > (http://community.hackit.cx/index.php?title=Social_Contract&diff=1773&oldid= > 1405 ).
Thanks! I've done a few extra changes. I've tried to keep the distinction between the studio and the project, but sometimes you were singling out the studio when it was not necessary - since we are a contributor, we abide by the same rules, and some are not only the studio values, but also the ones of the project. Have a look at the changes, and let me know what you think: http://community.hackit.cx/index.php?title=Social_Contract&diff=1926&oldid=1773 > I have a doubt regarding ownership of the code - should it belong to the > studio or to the committee (through a non-profit organization). For instance > in this regard I have doubts on article 7 of the contract, but this might > also impact other articles. What do you think ? It could - but we still have to decide if we ask for the ownership of the code. When you have read the article I've sent about it, let me know what you think - I'm still unsure about this. > While doing this, I've also slightly updated the ethics of the studio > (http://community.hackit.cx/wiki/Ethics ) and its values > (http://community.hackit.cx/wiki/Company_manifesto#The_game_studio) to > reflect the social contract. Sounds good! Xavier. _______________________________________________ Hackit Bar mailing list - [email protected] Wiki: http://community.hackit.cx/ List: http://community.hackit.cx/ml/ Forum: http://community.hackit.cx/forum/ Ideas: http://community.hackit.cx/ideas/ IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#politis
