Hi,
i have used bacula and bareos with several Tapelibs.
Overland ArcVault 24 (LTO3, one drive, SCSI)
Quantum Scalar i50 (LTO5, one drive, SAS)
IBM TS3584 (LTO6, 5 drives, 2 frames, FC)
all is working flawless but the IBM, the multi drive configuration is
still not perfect, and i'm missing some functions like disabling a drive
(because of fault or for maintenance).
The Overland and Quantum are running through one Backuphost with Linux
The IBM is driven by our FreeBSD 10 System and is working (after
selfcompiling the source).
My best System so far is the IBM one, 2nd Place is the Quantum. The
Worst ever! is the Overland system.
No Software problems, but the Hardware is a piece of crap, and we have
some Overland NEO8000 Systems in campus and i got told they have many
Hardware troubles too (but with a Commercial Backup Solution).
hope this helps.
Greets
Adam
Am 18.08.14 09:47, schrieb Philipp Storz:
Hello Thomas,
the testhardware in our lab is a T40 with two LTO4 FC Drives.
It works without problems.
Am 18.08.2014 09:38, schrieb Thomas de Klein SerNet:
Hi,
Are there any models that in your experience run exceptionaly well with
Bareos/Bacula on Linux?
Equally (or even more) interesting: Are there any models that you had a
realy hard time with and that you would rather avoid?
Thanks for your input guys!
So far I am considering a Tandberg T24 (12-24 Slots) or a Tandberg T40+ (24
- 40 Slots). If any of you have any experiences with these I would be very
curious to hear them. Apart from that I am still evaluating our needs
regarding backup size and duration.
Cheers
Thomas
--
Adam Podstawka
Informatician - Bioinformatics
Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"bareos-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
