I still maintain that with a little practice it is quite possible to isolate 
the fundamental with the index finger. I do it all the time in Weiss and later 
music.
Sterling




----- Original Message ----
From: Daniel Shoskes <dshos...@mac.com>
To: chriswi...@yahoo.com
Cc: BAROQUE-LUTE <baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>; Roman Turovsky 
<r.turov...@verizon.net>
Sent: Sat, October 24, 2009 12:24:37 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?

FWIW, I've brought this question up in lessons before, suggesting that  
a unison 6 th course would be a good idea. VERY strong opposition, I  
think primarily on historical grounds, from Pat O'Brien, Bob Barto and  
Richard Stone.

DS

On Oct 24, 2009, at 12:03 PM, chriswi...@yahoo.com wrote:

> I believe I'll third that.  I went from an octave to a unison on my  
> old lute but now have an octave 6th on the new lute.  I'm finding it  
> very, very difficult to make sense of melodies on the sixth course  
> that must be played with the fingers when the thumb is playing a  
> diapason at the same time.  This happens very often in the late  
> Weiss years and beyond.  I don't know of any historical sources  
> mentioning the unison 6th, though.
>
> Chris
>
> --- On Sat, 10/24/09, Roman Turovsky <r.turov...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Roman Turovsky <r.turov...@verizon.net>
>> Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave or no?
>> To: "BAROQUE-LUTE" <baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>> Date: Saturday, October 24, 2009, 9:19 AM
>> I'm with Dale on this issue.
>> RT
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dale Young" <dyoung5...@wowway.com>
>> To: "wikla" <wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>;
>> <baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>;
>> "Edward
>> Martin" <e...@gamutstrings.com>
>> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 9:31 PM
>> Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with octave
>> or no?
>>
>>
>>> I still think that the 6th course is used too often as
>> a melody string for
>>> that to be octave strung. When I hear the octave jump
>> at the 6th in a
>>> recording, I find it annoying for anything after 1730.
>> Just let the basses
>>> start at the 7th...unless you're playing that old
>> music...then who
>>> cares...not much melody to interfere with anyway.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>    cranky boy d.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Edward Martin" <e...@gamutstrings.com>
>>> To: "wikla" <wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>;
>> <baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:21 PM
>>> Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: B-lute 6th course, with
>> octave or no?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi, Arto..
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations in finally entering the realm of
>> baroque lute.  i
>>>> hope you find it rewarding.
>>>>
>>>> I think you can string it however you like, using
>> materials which are
>>>> your favorites.
>>>>
>>>> You are correct, in starting octaves at the 6th
>> course.  One thing I
>>>> find the best is to have the tension of the
>> octaves at least as
>>>> strong as the fundamentals.  There was a
>> practice about 20 years ago,
>>>> in which people used the octave only about 80% of
>> the tension of the
>>>> fundamentals, but this yielded unsatisfactory
>> result, in my
>>>> opinion.  This was with Pyramid wound strings
>> and nylon octaves.
>>>>
>>>> I usually use around 2.9 Kg of tension for the 4th
>> course to the 13th
>>>> course.
>>>>
>>>> One thing to keep in mind is that if you use wound
>> - overspun basses
>>>> starting at the 9th course, where the swan
>> extension starts, you may
>>>> not like it (I do not), as the sustain is too
>> great.  The very reason
>>>> for the added length for the lower basses is to
>> get a smaller
>>>> diameter string, so gut works beautifully for
>> those courses.  For 13
>>>> course lutes with a rider on 12 & 13, the
>> length is considerably
>>>> shorter, so a wound string may work better in that
>> application;  but
>>>> for the swan necks, gut rules.
>>>>
>>>> Good luck!
>>>>
>>>> ed
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At 05:22 PM 10/23/2009, wikla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> And of course I forgot to tell the string
>> lenghts:
>>>>>    8 courses (2 single, 6
>> double) 69 cm on the fingerboard and
>>>>>    5 (+1) courses 96 cm on the
>> swan extension
>>>>>
>>>>> Arto
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:28:53 +0300, wikla
>> <wi...@cs.helsinki.fi>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi b-lutenists,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I happened to get a "Martin Hoffmann"
>> lute (with bad stringing) to my
>>>>>> hands. Single strings, old everlasting,
>> and also rosted, Pyramid
>>>>>> single
>>>>>> basses etc. There are anyhow enough of
>> pegs to double string
>>>>>> everything
>>>>>> below the two top strings...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suppose the octave doubles should start
>> on the 6th course, the "A"
>>>>>> (and
>>>>>> of course below). Am I right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any other stringing advice? What string
>> tensions do you use? What
>>>>>> string
>>>>>> materials?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Arto
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To get on or off this list see list
>> information at
>>>>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Edward Martin
>>>> 2817 East 2nd Street
>>>> Duluth, Minnesota  55812
>>>> e-mail:  e...@gamutstrings.com
>>>> voice:  (218) 728-1202
>>>> http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1660298871&ref=name
>>>> http://www.myspace.com/edslute
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html





Reply via email to