On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 05:11:23AM -0500, Rick Scott wrote: > > In reading through the code, it appears that the desktop support is not > > finished yet. Is this correct? > > Is software ever really finished :) How so?
:-) I saw a desktop_write() but I didn't see a desktop_read(), so I assumed that meant it was not quite functional. > Only one program would have desktop0 open. That's not really > accurate ... Only one program would be reading/writing desktop at a > time, other programs/threads may have it open to monitor the modem > lines. Hmmm... I was hoping for sharing of the socket. I suppose if one program is in the middle of a full database download, the socket would need to be "busy". Still, I was hoping that it would be possible to do a sync at the same time as having a FUSE filesystem loaded, since normally there's lots of idle time between USB commands. Is there any way of telling which file descriptor is talking to the tty, in the kernel module? I'd like to know that it is theoretically possible, even if it isn't yet implemented. Thanks, - Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Barry-devel mailing list Barry-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/barry-devel
