On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 17:20 -0500, Martin Owens wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 11:56 -0800, Chris Maresca wrote: > > Just as a point here, and only because I know far too much about OSS > > licensing and have worked closely with the Linux Foundation. > > > > If you intend to follow kernel mainline as decided by Linus, he has > > already stated that ALL mainline code should be GPLv2 only. So I would > > strongly suggest that you have "GPL v2" (leave out the 'or later', > > that's enough). > > It's usually not like Linus to limit his future options like that. Are > you sure? can you cite?
google linus linux gpl version > > If it's true, then it would be a damning irrational act, since it's > going to be a bastard to move the kernel to GPLv4 in 80 years. And > starting a new kernel project, well... > > Regards, Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Barry-devel mailing list Barry-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/barry-devel
