On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Rick Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 17:20 -0500, Martin Owens wrote: >> On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 11:56 -0800, Chris Maresca wrote: >> > Just as a point here, and only because I know far too much about OSS >> > licensing and have worked closely with the Linux Foundation. >> > >> > If you intend to follow kernel mainline as decided by Linus, he has >> > already stated that ALL mainline code should be GPLv2 only. So I would >> > strongly suggest that you have "GPL v2" (leave out the 'or later', >> > that's enough). >> >> It's usually not like Linus to limit his future options like that. Are >> you sure? can you cite? > > google linus linux gpl version
Which all says that he will not relicense to v3, but says nothing about prohibiting code that is licensed 'or later.' I don't deny that he might have done so, but I'd like a specific cite for that. Luis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Barry-devel mailing list Barry-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/barry-devel
