<snip/> > Actually, the problem is that until very recently (perhaps a month > or two) Batik wasn't ready to consider doing Smile Animation. The > Batik team focused on getting a _complete_ implementation of the > Static portions of the SVG specification before considering issues of > dynamic SVG.
Excellent point, and I have to admit that having an SVG browser that actually seems to adhere to the specification, especially with respect to the DOM, is a major bonus. Unlike some other popular implementation... <grrrrr/> Hopefully I didn't come across as sounding critical of Batik, as that wasn't the intent, especially given that I haven't contributed any code. <snip/> Jason Foster --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
