At 04:45 p -0600 07/11/2011, LuKreme didst inscribe upon an electronic papyrus:
When was HTML 4.01 transitional relevant? 1999? What are you
transitioning from (HTML 3.2) and what are you transitioning to?
(HTML 4.01 Strict or HTML5).
But HotMetal was a steaming pile of monkey feces.
xhtml is a steaming pile of monkey feces. I stick to HTML 4.01
transitional for all my own websites. Like 50% of all surveyed, I
prefer UPPERCASE tags (yes, BBEdit's syntax coloring helps editing,
but uppercase tags are an additional help which I choose to retain).
I was around on the html-wg mailing list when xhtml was "invented"
and the idiocy displayed by supposedly intelligent people ("let's
embed XML into an HTML document") turned me off to it before it even
got the xhtml moniker. Besides, well-formed HTML beats malformed or
mistyped xhtml any day. I wish there were an HTML 4.5 to add the
xhtml5 tags (for validation).
And with that, our list admin is gonna kick in, lol. :-)
-boo
who won't add Google's +1 button because they insist on a proprietary <g> tag.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
"BBEdit Talk" discussion group on Google Groups.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
<http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en>
If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
please email "[email protected]" rather than posting to the group.
Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit>
