Hi! Wayne, All points taken. I misunderstood. I though that the particular ant was a normal part of the landscape as distinct from a pest. I agree with what you say for pests, but not all things, that eat things, are out of their range. For example, this year I lost my whole crop of nectarines, most of the apricots and half my almonds to two native birds, The Port Lincoln Parrot and The Galah. These birds are in their natural range and because I have planted exotic fruit trees where once was natural vegetation (long cleared before I bought the property) they are adapting their diet to what is available, nothing to do with anything wrong with the soil. (I have planted about thirty acres of native scrub, so am contributing to attracting native species back to the immediate area, from nearby natural areas.) I have to get off my butt and work out the Radionic Energies to make the immediate orchard area unattractive to them during the fruit season. I have no problem with them in the rest of the year. While in the UK I saw them doing the same thing with Grey Squirrel, Moles and Rabbits, they have no problem with them in the adjoining fields and woods, but do not want to share the home veggie patch and house garden with them. A little bit of well directed Radionics and they move out side the garden wall and one can still enjoy watching them from the kitchen window and still have a harvestable garden.
Gil Wayne and Sharon McEachern wrote: > Gil -- thanks for all your comments on all subjects which you are participating > on. Good stuff....... > > Because we are working on an issue here of a particular intrusion by a little > varmit -- I wanted to offer an "off the wall" comment (as I usually do) to > share another thought as to the challenge which is need of addressing. > > Obviously, there is something out of balance -- or there would be no attack by > the ants. Something needs fixing -- and then, there would be no ant attack.
