On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 4:29:58 PM UTC-6, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > Well, I'm not Gerald, but I'll be surprised if anything is changing on > the PCB. The change to a 4G eMMC requires no changes to the PCB and are > being made to improve margin, so don't expect to see any new parts. > > The eMMC may not require a new PCB layout, but the PCB has been revised for other minor changes in the past. I simply thought it might make sense to do both at the same time.
> On the other hand, why don't you just use P9.21 and P9.22 for the uart0 > rts/cts lines? I suspect Gerald didn't tie them on the main board > because they are available on the expansion headers. > I also require SPI0 so those pins are already allocated. BTW, I noticed that in the expansion header pinout tables in the SRM, some signals are prefixed with PR1_. what is the significance of this prefix? Is it related to the PRU processors? Dennis Cote -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
