I see. One of those commercial guys. I thought so. Gerald
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Dennis Cote <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday, May 1, 2014 9:44:35 AM UTC-6, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >> >> UART0 and PR1_UART0 are totally different chunks of hardware. Do not >> get confused by the fact that they both have "UART0" in the name, they >> are *NOT* the same. >> >> > I understand that. I was confused about why you suggested I could use the > P9.21 and P9.22 pins as UART0 RTS and CTS, when they are connected to > PR1_UART0 and not to UART0. My original question was about UART0 RTS/CTS > and you said were not connected to J1 because they are available on the > expansion header. > > You wrote: > On the other hand, why don't you just use P9.21 and P9.22 for the uart0 > rts/cts lines? I suspect Gerald didn't tie them on the main board > because they are available on the expansion headers. > > So is there something I am missing? It seems to me these expansion header > pins can't be used for UART0 RTS/CTS. > > Dennis Cote > > -- > For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BeagleBoard" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
