http://www.amazon.com/The-Art-Debugging-GDB-Eclipse/dp/1593271743
?? On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:38 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon, you may think I'm trying to be a smart ass but I'm not. Using Code > Composer studio, and various other IDE's for various platforms does not > mean you understand how to setup / use a GCC toolchain from the command > line. Which is really what you need to know to understand to use these > properly. > > All I have seen you say so far is that you have java GDB ( not even > remotely the same thing ) working, and that you've been programming in C / > C++ since the 80's. Personally, I have been programming C / C++ since the > early 90's, and never really truely used a GCC toolchain until I cut my > teeth on it with the MSP430 launchpad. > > My point ? Just because you *may* know gcc, and g++ does not mean you > understand the whole GCC toolchain. Again, there are books on the subject . > . . > > *In eclipse, I have created a C Project and in the Properties under C/C++ >> Build, Settings, I have the Cross Settings, Prefix set to:* >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> *arm-linux-gnueabihf- Path set to:/home/simon/gcc-linaro-arm-lin* >>> *ux-gnueabihf-4.8-2014.03_linux* >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> */bin Cross GCC Compiler, Command set to gccCross GCC Linker, Command >>> set to gccCross GCC Assemlber, Command set to asWhen I build the project I >>> get:/bin/sh: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: command not found HelloWorldBBB >>> C/C++ Problem* >>> >> > This is a pathing issue, eclipse does not know where to find the toolchain > binaries. I dont use Eclipse personally but perhaps for each binary you > need a proper fully qualified path to each binary? More information > required. > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John Syn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> From: Simon Platten <[email protected]> >> Reply-To: <[email protected]> >> Date: Friday, May 30, 2014 at 12:28 PM >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Eclipse C and Remote Debugging >> >> I've been writing software for various embedded platforms for a long >> time, MSP430, Echelon, PIC's. In the case of MSP430, the development suite >> was based on Eclipse. When writing software for PC104 platforms using QNX, >> the IDE was Momentics, which is eclipse. >> >> The assumption always seems to be that you are talking to someone who >> hasn't coded much before, I'm 44. I've been coding professionally since >> 1985. >> >> I can follow instructions as well as the next person, unfortunatley a lot >> of the information online is incomplete or the guides are lacking. >> >> I use Eclipse and Code Composer Studio all the time and they work just >> fine. I haven’t used GDBServer for a long time so it is difficult to advise >> you how to get this working. Currently I use Lauterbach JTAG tools for >> kernel code debugging and these tools are amazing because of their Linux >> Kernel Awareness. However, previously I used Ronetix PEEDI JTAG tools which >> make JTAG look like GDBServer. So my suggestion is to look at the support >> docs on the Ronetix website as they explain how to setup Eclipse to work >> with GDBServer. If this doesn’t work, then there is possibly some >> incompatibility between the version of Eclipse and GDBServer. >> >> Regards, >> John >> >> >> >> >> >> On Friday, 30 May 2014 20:21:41 UTC+1, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> Frankly, when developing for embedded platforms, yes, IDEs are too much >>> to ask for. 90% of embedded programming today is done with command-line >>> tools as it has been for decades. Once in a while someone builds an IDE, >>> but they are invariably so limited in application as to be more or a >>> straightjacket than a real tool. The amount of work it takes to produce a >>> truly useful IDE makes sense only if you're developing on a commercial >>> platform with millions of credit-card holding users. So if you want to >>> develop for Windows, Android, and such, good IDEs are available. If you're >>> programming a custom board, well, better get used to building your own >>> tools. >>> >>> >>> On Friday, May 30, 2014 11:52:53 AM UTC-7, Simon Platten wrote: >>>> >>>> true, is it to much to ask to use an IDE? >>>> >>>> I have it all working for Java, would just like to do the same for C. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, 30 May 2014 19:37:58 UTC+1, RobertCNelson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Platten <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > I know C and C++ very well...I've been developing in it since the >>>>> 80's. >>>>> > >>>>> > What I find difficult is the lack of complete information, is it to >>>>> much to >>>>> > expect that having bought the hardware for the software and >>>>> documentation to >>>>> > be complete? >>>>> > >>>>> > Sorry, I'm so fed up with dead ends...and pissy people with >>>>> atitudes, that >>>>> > instead of offering help, make wise cracks. >>>>> > >>>>> > Eclipse isn't the problem, the set-up of the toolchain is. >>>>> > >>>>> > Sorry, I guess you can tell, I'm a bit tired and just want to make >>>>> some >>>>> > progress on the project, instead of battling with the set-up. >>>>> >>>>> You can always ssh in and build on the target. That's just the way >>>>> i've always done it. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Robert Nelson >>>>> http://www.rcn-ee.com/ >>>>> >>>> -- >> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BeagleBoard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BeagleBoard" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
