Can this be of any help?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpg61xG9Egc
It’s an interesting video by Derek Mollow titled
Beaglebone: Java Setup (JRE), Eclipse and Remote System Explorer (RSE)




Have orderred this one:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/GDB-Pocket-Reference-OReilly/dp/0596100272/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1401554600&sr=8-1&keywords=gdb


On Friday, 30 May 2014 22:47:27 UTC+1, William Hermans wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Art-Debugging-GDB-Eclipse/dp/1593271743

??

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:38 PM, William Hermans 
<[email protected]<javascript:>> wrote:
Simon, you may think I'm trying to be a smart ass but I'm not. Using Code 
Composer studio, and various other IDE's for various platforms does not mean 
you understand how to setup / use a GCC toolchain from the command line. Which 
is really what you need to know to understand to use these properly.
All I have seen you say so far is that you have java GDB ( not even remotely 
the same thing ) working, and that you've been programming in C / C++ since the 
80's. Personally, I have been programming C / C++ since the early 90's, and 
never really truely used a GCC toolchain until I cut my teeth on it with the 
MSP430 launchpad.
My point ? Just because you *may* know gcc, and g++ does not mean you 
understand the whole GCC toolchain. Again, there are books on the subject . . .

In eclipse, I have created a C Project and in the Properties under C/C++ Build, 
Settings, I have the Cross Settings, Prefix set to:
arm-linux-gnueabihf-

Path set to:

/home/simon/gcc-linaro-arm-lin
ux-gnueabihf-4.8-2014.03_linux/bin

Cross GCC Compiler, Command set to gcc
Cross GCC Linker, Command set to gcc
Cross GCC Assemlber, Command set to as

When I build the project I get:
/bin/sh: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: command not found    HelloWorldBBB            
 C/C++ Problem

This is a pathing issue, eclipse does not know where to find the toolchain 
binaries. I dont use Eclipse personally but perhaps for each binary you need a 
proper fully qualified path to each binary? More information required.

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John Syn <[email protected]<javascript:>> 
wrote:

From: Simon Platten <[email protected]<javascript:>>
Reply-To: <[email protected]<javascript:>>
Date: Friday, May 30, 2014 at 12:28 PM
To: <[email protected]<javascript:>>
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Eclipse C and Remote Debugging

I've been writing software for various embedded platforms for a long time, 
MSP430, Echelon, PIC's.  In the case of MSP430, the development suite was based 
on Eclipse.  When writing software for PC104 platforms using QNX, the IDE was 
Momentics, which is eclipse.

The assumption always seems to be that you are talking to someone who hasn't 
coded much before, I'm 44.  I've been coding professionally since 1985.

I can follow instructions as well as the next person, unfortunatley a lot of 
the information online is incomplete or the guides are lacking.
I use Eclipse and Code Composer Studio all the time and they work just fine. I 
haven’t used GDBServer for a long time so it is difficult to advise you how to 
get this working. Currently I use Lauterbach JTAG tools for kernel code 
debugging and these tools are amazing because of their Linux Kernel Awareness. 
However, previously I used Ronetix PEEDI JTAG tools which make JTAG look like 
GDBServer. So my suggestion is to look at the support docs on the Ronetix 
website as they explain how to setup Eclipse to work with GDBServer. If this 
doesn’t work, then there is possibly some incompatibility between the version 
of Eclipse and GDBServer.

Regards,
John




On Friday, 30 May 2014 20:21:41 UTC+1, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
wrote:
Frankly, when developing for embedded platforms, yes, IDEs are too much to ask 
for. 90% of embedded programming today is done with command-line tools as it 
has been for decades. Once in a while someone builds an IDE, but they are 
invariably so limited in application as to be more or a straightjacket than a 
real tool.  The amount of work it takes to produce a truly useful IDE makes 
sense only if you're developing on a commercial platform with millions of 
credit-card holding users. So if you want to develop for Windows, Android, and 
such, good IDEs are available. If you're programming a custom board, well, 
better get used to building your own tools.


On Friday, May 30, 2014 11:52:53 AM UTC-7, Simon Platten wrote:
true, is it to much to ask to use an IDE?

I have it all working for Java, would just like to do the same for C.


On Friday, 30 May 2014 19:37:58 UTC+1, RobertCNelson wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Platten 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I know C and C++ very well...I've been developing in it since the 80's.
>
> What I find difficult is the lack of complete information, is it to much to
> expect that having bought the hardware for the software and documentation to
> be complete?
>
> Sorry, I'm so fed up with dead ends...and pissy people with atitudes, that
> instead of offering help, make wise cracks.
>
> Eclipse isn't the problem, the set-up of the toolchain is.
>
> Sorry, I guess you can tell, I'm a bit tired and just want to make some
> progress on the project, instead of battling with the set-up.

You can always ssh in and build on the target.  That's just the way
i've always done it.

Regards,

--
Robert Nelson
http://www.rcn-ee.com/
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected]<javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected]<javascript:>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

________________________________

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to