Have orderred this one: http://www.amazon.co.uk/GDB-Pocket-Reference-OReilly/dp/0596100272/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1401554600&sr=8-1&keywords=gdb
On Friday, 30 May 2014 22:47:27 UTC+1, William Hermans wrote: > > http://www.amazon.com/The-Art-Debugging-GDB-Eclipse/dp/1593271743 > > ?? > > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:38 PM, William Hermans <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Simon, you may think I'm trying to be a smart ass but I'm not. Using Code >> Composer studio, and various other IDE's for various platforms does not >> mean you understand how to setup / use a GCC toolchain from the command >> line. Which is really what you need to know to understand to use these >> properly. >> >> All I have seen you say so far is that you have java GDB ( not even >> remotely the same thing ) working, and that you've been programming in C / >> C++ since the 80's. Personally, I have been programming C / C++ since the >> early 90's, and never really truely used a GCC toolchain until I cut my >> teeth on it with the MSP430 launchpad. >> >> My point ? Just because you *may* know gcc, and g++ does not mean you >> understand the whole GCC toolchain. Again, there are books on the subject . >> . . >> >> *In eclipse, I have created a C Project and in the Properties under C/C++ >>> Build, Settings, I have the Cross Settings, Prefix set to:* >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *arm-linux-gnueabihf- Path set to:/home/simon/gcc-linaro-arm-lin* >>>> *ux-gnueabihf-4.8-2014.03_linux* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> */bin Cross GCC Compiler, Command set to gccCross GCC Linker, Command >>>> set to gccCross GCC Assemlber, Command set to asWhen I build the project I >>>> get:/bin/sh: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: command not found HelloWorldBBB >>>> >>>> C/C++ Problem* >>>> >>> >> This is a pathing issue, eclipse does not know where to find the >> toolchain binaries. I dont use Eclipse personally but perhaps for each >> binary you need a proper fully qualified path to each binary? More >> information required. >> >> >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John Syn <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> >>> From: Simon Platten <[email protected] <javascript:>> >>> Reply-To: <[email protected] <javascript:>> >>> Date: Friday, May 30, 2014 at 12:28 PM >>> To: <[email protected] <javascript:>> >>> Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Eclipse C and Remote Debugging >>> >>> I've been writing software for various embedded platforms for a long >>> time, MSP430, Echelon, PIC's. In the case of MSP430, the development suite >>> was based on Eclipse. When writing software for PC104 platforms using QNX, >>> the IDE was Momentics, which is eclipse. >>> >>> The assumption always seems to be that you are talking to someone who >>> hasn't coded much before, I'm 44. I've been coding professionally since >>> 1985. >>> >>> I can follow instructions as well as the next person, unfortunatley a >>> lot of the information online is incomplete or the guides are lacking. >>> >>> I use Eclipse and Code Composer Studio all the time and they work just >>> fine. I haven’t used GDBServer for a long time so it is difficult to advise >>> you how to get this working. Currently I use Lauterbach JTAG tools for >>> kernel code debugging and these tools are amazing because of their Linux >>> Kernel Awareness. However, previously I used Ronetix PEEDI JTAG tools which >>> make JTAG look like GDBServer. So my suggestion is to look at the support >>> docs on the Ronetix website as they explain how to setup Eclipse to work >>> with GDBServer. If this doesn’t work, then there is possibly some >>> incompatibility between the version of Eclipse and GDBServer. >>> >>> Regards, >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, 30 May 2014 20:21:41 UTC+1, [email protected] wrote: >>>> >>>> Frankly, when developing for embedded platforms, yes, IDEs are too much >>>> to ask for. 90% of embedded programming today is done with command-line >>>> tools as it has been for decades. Once in a while someone builds an IDE, >>>> but they are invariably so limited in application as to be more or a >>>> straightjacket than a real tool. The amount of work it takes to produce a >>>> truly useful IDE makes sense only if you're developing on a commercial >>>> platform with millions of credit-card holding users. So if you want to >>>> develop for Windows, Android, and such, good IDEs are available. If you're >>>> programming a custom board, well, better get used to building your own >>>> tools. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Friday, May 30, 2014 11:52:53 AM UTC-7, Simon Platten wrote: >>>>> >>>>> true, is it to much to ask to use an IDE? >>>>> >>>>> I have it all working for Java, would just like to do the same for C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Friday, 30 May 2014 19:37:58 UTC+1, RobertCNelson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Simon Platten <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > I know C and C++ very well...I've been developing in it since the >>>>>> 80's. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > What I find difficult is the lack of complete information, is it to >>>>>> much to >>>>>> > expect that having bought the hardware for the software and >>>>>> documentation to >>>>>> > be complete? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Sorry, I'm so fed up with dead ends...and pissy people with >>>>>> atitudes, that >>>>>> > instead of offering help, make wise cracks. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Eclipse isn't the problem, the set-up of the toolchain is. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Sorry, I guess you can tell, I'm a bit tired and just want to make >>>>>> some >>>>>> > progress on the project, instead of battling with the set-up. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can always ssh in and build on the target. That's just the way >>>>>> i've always done it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Robert Nelson >>>>>> http://www.rcn-ee.com/ >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> -- >>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "BeagleBoard" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
