On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Taceant Omnes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13 November 2015 at 17:49, Robert Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah good point. ;) >> >> root@beaglebone:~# uname -r ; ls -l >> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state0/ >> 4.1.13-ti-r29.4 >> total 0 >> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 desc >> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 disable >> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 latency >> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 name >> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 power >> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 residency >> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 time >> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Nov 13 17:46 usage >> >> https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/commit/7df6a18cbcd567712edd1e1a4a774742d510dbe3 > > Great, thanks. > > My second question was if there is a Debian package to manage cpuidle > similar to Ubuntu [1]. Fedora has cpupower that takes the "idle-set" > or "idle-info" parameters (among others). I am not sure if the Ubuntu > allows setting though.
There doesn't seem to be.. https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=sid&arch=any&mode=exactfilename&searchon=contents&keywords=cpupower Since it's based inside the kernel.org's kernel tree, do we want version specifi: cpupower-v4.1 cpupower-v4.2 Or just: cpupower (always built on kernel.org HEAD) package? Regards, -- Robert Nelson https://rcn-ee.com/ -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
