On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:46:43 -0700, you wrote:

>Harvey, you raised several very good points. I cannot say I disagree with 
>anything you said.

Thank you.  I prefer paranoid designs myself.  However, I don't design
commercial products, I design stuff for myself.  It does make a
difference.  If I get it wrong, I have to fix it...  and I have LOTS
of stuff to fix myself.

I also don't have to design to a price point, at least, not as much as
for a commercial product.

Harvey


>
>Regards,
>John
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 4, 2016, at 3:36 PM, Harvey White <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016 15:13:00 -0700, you wrote:
>> 
>>> Pay no attention to William. You comments are welcome and Gerald has 
>>> accepted your comments as valuable input by thanking your for your 
>>> feedback. Now, let me address your concerns:
>> 
>> From my own engineering standpoint (and opinions will, of course,
>> vary):
>>> 
>>> 1) The power supply used to power the BBB should be selected so that it 
>>> does not damage the BBB, so a 2A power supply was specified. If you wish to 
>>> change that specification, then the onus is on you to verify that a 4A 
>>> power supply will not damage the BBB. Your conclusion that is may damage 
>>> the BBB means that you should not use a 4A power supply. In addition, a 
>>> power supply that is spec’d at 4A should not shutdown when it sees a 4A 
>>> load, but rather, it should current limit at 4A. If the power supply is 
>>> spec’d at 4A, then 4A should not be treated as a short circuit. 
>> 
>> I would have designed the power supply circuitry so that with a power
>> supply of appropriate minimum rating, the maximum rating would not
>> have mattered.  Using a power supply with a maximum current rating to
>> avoid damaging circuitry is not (again, IMHO) the best solution.  If,
>> because of economic considerations, that decision is made, then it is
>> imperative of the designer to put this information specifically in the
>> power supply recommendations.  Not doing this leads to damage, doing
>> this puts the responsibility on the user.  Is this a "before the
>> design/after the design"?  I don't know, and I don't remember (either
>> way) if this warning was ever in the power supply requirements.
>> Hindsight is 20/20, of course.  If it's that important, then perhaps
>> the documentation needs to be changed.  Decision not up to me.
>> 
>> 
>>> 2) The TI spec for the TPS65217C is a general recommendation as they are 
>>> unaware of how you are going to use the part. The BBB SYS_5V powers several 
>>> subsystems, including HDMI, I/O (VDD_3V3B) and USB. Clearly you could move 
>>> the 100uF to the other side of the TPS2051, but then you need an additional 
>>> capacitor on the SYS_5V which increases the cost and doesn’t provide any 
>>> clear benefit, if you choose the correct power supply.
>> 
>> "correct power supply" bothers me.  I'm familiar with minimum current
>> capacity, voltage limits, short circuit current limits (infrequently
>> applied).  Again, "a 4 amp power supply will allow the board to damage
>> itself, so we depend on a 2 amp maximum supply to avoid damage."  This
>> could be discussed a bit....
>> 
>> 
>>> 3) As Gerald has pointed out, the BBB is just a reference design. It was 
>>> designed as a low cost solution which meant that tradeoffs were required to 
>>> keep the price low. Clearly things could have been done differently, but 
>>> then the BBB price would have been much higher and the board larger. Given 
>>> that most users would probably not need these extra features, they were not 
>>> incorporated into the current design. There are several spinoffs of the 
>>> BBB, some with wifi, some with more RAM, etc, but none have been as 
>>> successful as the BBB. 
>> 
>> Hmmm, well, perhaps (although not required) it might be nice to know
>> what the engineering limitations are of the design.
>> 
>> I've seen 1) the ones I know about, and 2) the ones I haven't found
>> out yet... and 3) the ones people are going to have to tell me
>> about...
>> 
>> and I do like paranoid designs.....
>> 
>> Harvey
>> 
>> 
>>> 4) While I have provided Gerald input into both the BBB and BeagleBoard-x15 
>>> designs, I ultimately defer to his judgement because he has the track 
>>> record or having designed several products that are very successful. 
>>> 
>>> From my prospective, the BBB design is good, but your input was none the 
>>> less valuable. 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Jul 4, 2016, at 2:11 PM, William Hermans <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> kzsoltkzsolt,
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to point out to you that you're talking to *the* person who 
>>>> designed the beaglebones, who also used to work for Texas Instruments at 
>>>> some point in his career. Someone who has made his designs free of charge 
>>>> to the public, which he has made perfectly clear to you in these post that 
>>>> you're free to change and use for your own personal use.
>>>> 
>>>> So, telling him things, he probably already knows, in hopes of making 
>>>> yourself looks good. Actually make you look like a "know it all". e.g. it 
>>>> doesn't make you look good.
>>>> 
>>>> SO perhaps you should realize that Gerald is probably well aware of what 
>>>> you're trying to discuss here, but is unwilling to change for various 
>>>> reasons. Reason, that you, I, or the next person do not need to 
>>>> understand. Because we can change to designs to our own liking if we so 
>>>> wish.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Gerald Coley <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> Thank you for your feedback. 
>>>> 
>>>> Gerald
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:18 PM, <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> First of all making changes on design "tomorrow" is irresponsible, so I 
>>>> never request it. But good to know where is some "leak" in design. For 
>>>> example it is help to make workaround.
>>>> 
>>>> "TI did not write that specification"
>>>> No, but use it in all reference design. See TI TPS20x1 PDS application 
>>>> information. See for example TPS2051 docu Fig 33.
>>>> 
>>>> "If you put the CAP after the switch then ..."  
>>>> Then why CAP placed OUT of PDS in all TI application information? 
>>>> Because PDS has soft start feature which prevent overload IN (BBB SYS 
>>>> power rail). See for example TPS2051 docu Fig 4 and 8.
>>>> Fig 8 is perfect draw for this. The soft start feature limit charge of 
>>>> 100uF to 0,5A, therefore current never exceed USB1 and 2 current limit, 
>>>> therefore no dip on IN.
>>>> This is one main function of PDS.
>>>> 
>>>> "I did not design the board for your application"
>>>> It is not required. But during research work to specify our problem I 
>>>> found many topic where users discover mysterious problems with power 
>>>> supply, and try to found a right one for BBB. This can be originated from 
>>>> startup current peak.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
>>>> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to 
>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/b974f98a-0cff-4380-af1f-9ce5db9e199f%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/b974f98a-0cff-4380-af1f-9ce5db9e199f%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>> 
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Gerald
>>>> 
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://beagleboard.org/ <http://beagleboard.org/>
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
>>>> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to 
>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAHK_S%2BcAH_U%3DVtJmLq62wrVPmRg8%2Bn27YjWM_oeorZezSTKorQ%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CAHK_S%2BcAH_U%3DVtJmLq62wrVPmRg8%2Bn27YjWM_oeorZezSTKorQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>> 
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss 
>>>> <http://beagleboard.org/discuss>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to 
>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORo-TL2x_vUEni%2B-daiSEQXxLUU_N5p%2BEh%2Bt6tzpuuPT0g%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORo-TL2x_vUEni%2B-daiSEQXxLUU_N5p%2BEh%2Bt6tzpuuPT0g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
>> 
>> -- 
>> For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "BeagleBoard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/cjolnb1s1bddugkd1v6c4jeqm1a0mhmvhh%404ax.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/chqlnbta1nptonjl04usmtj40sk6m36rpt%404ax.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to