Shawn H. Corey wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Is it appropriate to reply with code that I know for fact works, but >> rely on the senior members to help catch possible missed edge-cases and >> optimization issues, and essentially turn my response into an implicit >> code review? What 'label' would I pre-declare the code with in this >> case, if any? > > You should try to make your code as complete as possible. People don't > like it when > >
heh, if that wasn't designed as either a distinctive lesson or an accident, I feel like slugging you with my hockey stick ;) Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
