Hi, The 2 bugs are: 1. https://jira01.devtools.intel.com/browse/VIZ-4490 VIZ-4490 [HSW/IVB/BYT-M] After update opencv, 1 opencv case (opencv_test_imgproc/OCL_Imgproc/HoughLines)fail 2. https://jira01.devtools.intel.com/browse/VIZ-4489 VIZ-4489 [IVB/HSW/BYT-M] After update opencv, some opencv cases(eg.opencv_test_imgproc/OCL_ImgProc/Canny)fail
Thanks, Meng > -----Original Message----- > From: Beignet [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > [email protected] > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:59 PM > To: Zhigang Gong > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Beignet] possilbe bug when run opencv_test_imgproc > > Could you give me one URL? > Thanks. > > Yan Wang > > > All of these three failures are already tracked in JIRA. > > If you have access to JIRA, you can check them easily. > > > > Thanks, > > Zhigang Gong. > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:33 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sure. I could try Yang Rong's patch. > >> BTW, I also meet the following failed cases. Could you please confirm > >> them? Thanks. > >> > >> [ FAILED ] 3 tests, listed below: > >> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImgProc/Canny.Accuracy/8, where GetParam() = > >> (Channels(3), AppertureSize(3), L2gradient(false), UseRoi(false)) [ > >> FAILED ] OCL_ImgProc/Canny.Accuracy/10, where GetParam() = > >> (Channels(3), AppertureSize(3), L2gradient(true), UseRoi(false)) [ > >> FAILED ] OCL_Imgproc/HoughLines.RealImage/2, where GetParam() = (1, > >> 0.00872665, 80) > >> > >> Yan Wang > >> > >>> I have BYT box, an IVB machine and a HSW notebook. All of them > >>> haven't this issue. > >>> Yang rong is working on a race condition patch. This issue may be > >>> related. You may try again once he send out the patch. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:46 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hi, Zhigang, > >>>> May your platform also get failed cases when run > >>>> OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat* although no crash, because I have only > >>>> Baytail T platfrom. I am not sure the other platform has the same > >>>> issue. > >>>> If yes, I could try to investigate the reason. It may have issue > >>>> of filter2D OpenCL implementation in OpenCV. > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Yan Wang > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, All, > >>>>> I found one possible bug for review. > >>>>> if run the following: > >>>>> ./opencv_test_imgproc --gtest_filter=OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat*. > >>>>> OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 failed and continue. But the > >>>>> whole test flow will crash in OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257: > >>>>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/240, where GetParam() = > >>>>> (CV_8U, Channels(2), 7, 1, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (6433 > >>>>> ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 (358 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 (311 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 (6 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 (203 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 (207 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 (203 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 (7 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 (210 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 (207 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 (208 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 (7 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 (214 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 (207 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 (212 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 > >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 (7 ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 > >>>>> > /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:106: > >>>>> Failure > >>>>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst, udst)) <= (threshold), actual: > >>>>> 255 > >>>>> vs 1 > >>>>> Size: [92 x 61] > >>>>> > >>>>> > /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:107: > >>>>> Failure > >>>>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst_roi, udst_roi)) <= > >>>>> (threshold), > >>>>> actual: 255 vs 1 > >>>>> Size: [92 x 61] > >>>>> > >>>>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256, where GetParam() = > >>>>> (CV_8U, Channels(2), 7, 4, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (7413 > >>>>> ms) > >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 > >>>>> opencv_test_imgproc: > >>>>> /home/yanwang/beignet/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c:703: > >>>>> intel_gpgpu_check_binded_buf_address: Assertion > >>>>> `gpgpu->binded_buf[i]->offset != 0' failed. > >>>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) > >>>>> > >>>>> But if I run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 only, it passed. I > >>>>> think > >>>>> 256 > >>>>> case may influence it. > >>>>> Thanks. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yan Wang > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Beignet mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet > >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Beignet mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet _______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
