Thanks for your help. I will check. Yan Wang
> Hi, > The 2 bugs are: > 1. https://jira01.devtools.intel.com/browse/VIZ-4490 > VIZ-4490 [HSW/IVB/BYT-M] After update opencv, 1 opencv case > (opencv_test_imgproc/OCL_Imgproc/HoughLines)fail > > 2. https://jira01.devtools.intel.com/browse/VIZ-4489 > VIZ-4489 [IVB/HSW/BYT-M] After update opencv, some opencv > cases(eg.opencv_test_imgproc/OCL_ImgProc/Canny)fail > > Thanks, > Meng > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf >> Of >> yan.w...@linux.intel.com >> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:59 PM >> To: Zhigang Gong >> Cc: yan.w...@linux.intel.com; beignet@lists.freedesktop.org >> Subject: Re: [Beignet] possilbe bug when run opencv_test_imgproc >> >> Could you give me one URL? >> Thanks. >> >> Yan Wang >> >> > All of these three failures are already tracked in JIRA. >> > If you have access to JIRA, you can check them easily. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Zhigang Gong. >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:33 PM, <yan.w...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> Sure. I could try Yang Rong's patch. >> >> BTW, I also meet the following failed cases. Could you please confirm >> >> them? Thanks. >> >> >> >> [ FAILED ] 3 tests, listed below: >> >> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImgProc/Canny.Accuracy/8, where GetParam() = >> >> (Channels(3), AppertureSize(3), L2gradient(false), UseRoi(false)) [ >> >> FAILED ] OCL_ImgProc/Canny.Accuracy/10, where GetParam() = >> >> (Channels(3), AppertureSize(3), L2gradient(true), UseRoi(false)) [ >> >> FAILED ] OCL_Imgproc/HoughLines.RealImage/2, where GetParam() = (1, >> >> 0.00872665, 80) >> >> >> >> Yan Wang >> >> >> >>> I have BYT box, an IVB machine and a HSW notebook. All of them >> >>> haven't this issue. >> >>> Yang rong is working on a race condition patch. This issue may be >> >>> related. You may try again once he send out the patch. >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:46 PM, <yan.w...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >>>> Hi, Zhigang, >> >>>> May your platform also get failed cases when run >> >>>> OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat* although no crash, because I have only >> >>>> Baytail T platfrom. I am not sure the other platform has the same >> >>>> issue. >> >>>> If yes, I could try to investigate the reason. It may have issue >> >>>> of filter2D OpenCL implementation in OpenCV. >> >>>> Thanks. >> >>>> >> >>>> Yan Wang >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi, All, >> >>>>> I found one possible bug for review. >> >>>>> if run the following: >> >>>>> ./opencv_test_imgproc --gtest_filter=OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat*. >> >>>>> OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 failed and continue. But the >> >>>>> whole test flow will crash in OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257: >> >>>>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/240, where GetParam() = >> >>>>> (CV_8U, Channels(2), 7, 1, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (6433 >> >>>>> ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 (358 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 (311 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 (6 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 (203 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 (207 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 (203 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 (7 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 (210 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 (207 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 (208 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 (7 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 (214 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 (207 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 (212 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 >> >>>>> [ OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 (7 ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 >> >>>>> >> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:106: >> >>>>> Failure >> >>>>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst, udst)) <= (threshold), >> actual: >> >>>>> 255 >> >>>>> vs 1 >> >>>>> Size: [92 x 61] >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:107: >> >>>>> Failure >> >>>>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst_roi, udst_roi)) <= >> >>>>> (threshold), >> >>>>> actual: 255 vs 1 >> >>>>> Size: [92 x 61] >> >>>>> >> >>>>> [ FAILED ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256, where GetParam() = >> >>>>> (CV_8U, Channels(2), 7, 4, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (7413 >> >>>>> ms) >> >>>>> [ RUN ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 >> >>>>> opencv_test_imgproc: >> >>>>> /home/yanwang/beignet/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c:703: >> >>>>> intel_gpgpu_check_binded_buf_address: Assertion >> >>>>> `gpgpu->binded_buf[i]->offset != 0' failed. >> >>>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> But if I run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 only, it passed. I >> >>>>> think >> >>>>> 256 >> >>>>> case may influence it. >> >>>>> Thanks. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Yan Wang >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Beignet mailing list >> >>>> Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org >> >>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet >> >>> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Beignet mailing list >> Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet > _______________________________________________ > Beignet mailing list > Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet > _______________________________________________ Beignet mailing list Beignet@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet