Hello Jacob, Yes, the BPS and SQL Server 2005 are on the new machine.This server is dedicated entirely to BPS, there is nothing else running on it. Resources being used right now run about 8 to 10 percent. It is running under VMWare server. We only have a handful of users, so traffic is not overwhelming.
Stan M On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jacob Shields<[email protected]> wrote: > Are you hosting BPS and SQL 2005 on the same box? Also check ur resources to > make sure the server isn't being tasked to much. Are you using VMWare server > or VMWare ESXi? > > Thank You, > > Jacob Shields > Partner > Technology Director > http://www.buzzworthyconsulting.net > [email protected] > Cell: 906.282.2248 > Fax: 313.748.1205 > > "Sent via my BlackBerry Wireless handset" > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > NOTICE: The information contained in this message is intended only for the > above named and confidential use of the recipient(s). If the reader of this > message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering > it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received > this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or > copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify us immediately, and destroy all copies > of this message. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri Jul 17 07:48:08 2009 > Subject: [Bes-admins] Reconciliation issues after BES move > > We recently moved our BPS server from the SBS2003 server that it was > installed on. We used MSDE on that server. The current server is > Windows 2003 Standard 32bit with SQL Server 2005 running under VMWare > server with 2GB of memory. The host server has 32GB of memory and is > Windows Server 2003 Standard 64bit. All servers are on the same > network and in the same physical space. The move was uneventful, > however, our users, me included, now see an entirely different > behavior on message reconciliation. > > On the old setup, message reconciliation was almost instantaneous, > with very few messages taking a few minutes at the most. Under the new > server, messages are taking up to 20 to 30 minutes to reconcile, with > 5 or 6 minutes now being "fast". > > I've researched and I see that the current behavior is supposed to be > considered normal. The problem I have is how do I explain that to the > boss (who's not happy) when we had much quicker reconciliation the > last couple of years? > > Stan M. > _______________________________________________ > Bes-Admins mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins > http://www.dataoutages.com > http://www.dataoutagenews.com > RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins > --------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Bes-Admins mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins > http://www.dataoutages.com > http://www.dataoutagenews.com > RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins > --------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ Bes-Admins mailing list [email protected] http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins http://www.dataoutages.com http://www.dataoutagenews.com RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins ---------------------------------
