Art and Jacob - I'll have to look into what you have both said. I just automatically assumed that SQL2005 would be better or more capable on a server for BPS.
Stan Mocek On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Jacob Shields<[email protected]> wrote: > Stan, > > You may want to try setting the BPS back up using MSDE instead and see if > this solves the issue. > > > Thank You, > > Jacob Shields > Partner > Technology Director > http://www.buzzworthyconsulting.net > [email protected] > Cell: 906.282.2248 > Fax: 313.748.1205 > > "Sent via my BlackBerry Wireless handset" > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > NOTICE: The information contained in this message is intended only for the > above named and confidential use of the recipient(s). If the reader of this > message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering > it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received > this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or > copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify us immediately, and destroy all copies > of this message. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri Jul 17 08:39:24 2009 > Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] Reconciliation issues after BES move > > My setup is almost the same except I am using MSDE and cut the RAM back to 1 > GB after monitoring usage for a few weeks. WS2k3 Pro is running on an ESX > host. > > Our performance is what you describe you used to have; email generally hits > my BB before it hits my desktop. > > Perhaps for the smaller number of users, SQL2005 is overkill and the > bottleneck in your setup. > > > -- > Art Alexion > MIS/Central Office Support > Resources for Human Development > (sent from my cell phone) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > <[email protected]> > To: A list for BES Admin's to discuss issues,etc. > <[email protected]> > Sent: Fri Jul 17 09:15:16 2009 > Subject: Re: [Bes-admins] Reconciliation issues after BES move > > Hello Jacob, > > Yes, the BPS and SQL Server 2005 are on the new machine.This server is > dedicated entirely to BPS, there is nothing else running on it. > Resources being used right now run about 8 to 10 percent. It is > running under VMWare server. We only have a handful of users, so > traffic is not overwhelming. > > Stan M > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jacob > Shields<[email protected]> wrote: >> Are you hosting BPS and SQL 2005 on the same box? Also check ur resources >> to >> make sure the server isn't being tasked to much. Are you using VMWare >> server >> or VMWare ESXi? >> >> Thank You, >> >> Jacob Shields >> Partner >> Technology Director >> http://www.buzzworthyconsulting.net >> [email protected] >> Cell: 906.282.2248 >> Fax: 313.748.1205 >> >> "Sent via my BlackBerry Wireless handset" >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> NOTICE: The information contained in this message is intended only for the >> above named and confidential use of the recipient(s). If the reader of >> this >> message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for >> delivering >> it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have >> received >> this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, >> or >> copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and destroy all >> copies >> of this message. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: [email protected] >> <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Sent: Fri Jul 17 07:48:08 2009 >> Subject: [Bes-admins] Reconciliation issues after BES move >> >> We recently moved our BPS server from the SBS2003 server that it was >> installed on. We used MSDE on that server. The current server is >> Windows 2003 Standard 32bit with SQL Server 2005 running under VMWare >> server with 2GB of memory. The host server has 32GB of memory and is >> Windows Server 2003 Standard 64bit. All servers are on the same >> network and in the same physical space. The move was uneventful, >> however, our users, me included, now see an entirely different >> behavior on message reconciliation. >> >> On the old setup, message reconciliation was almost instantaneous, >> with very few messages taking a few minutes at the most. Under the new >> server, messages are taking up to 20 to 30 minutes to reconcile, with >> 5 or 6 minutes now being "fast". >> >> I've researched and I see that the current behavior is supposed to be >> considered normal. The problem I have is how do I explain that to the >> boss (who's not happy) when we had much quicker reconciliation the >> last couple of years? >> >> Stan M. >> _______________________________________________ >> Bes-Admins mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins >> http://www.dataoutages.com >> http://www.dataoutagenews.com >> RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins >> --------------------------------- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bes-Admins mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins >> http://www.dataoutages.com >> http://www.dataoutagenews.com >> RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins >> --------------------------------- >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Bes-Admins mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins > http://www.dataoutages.com > http://www.dataoutagenews.com > RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins > --------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Bes-Admins mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins > http://www.dataoutages.com > http://www.dataoutagenews.com > RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins > --------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Bes-Admins mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins > http://www.dataoutages.com > http://www.dataoutagenews.com > RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins > --------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ Bes-Admins mailing list [email protected] http://www.dataoutages.com/mailman/listinfo/bes-admins http://www.dataoutages.com http://www.dataoutagenews.com RSS Feed: http://feeds.feedburner.com/Bes-admins ---------------------------------
