On December 5, 2017 at 9:25:39 AM, [email protected] ( [email protected]) wrote:
> All, > > Martin Vigoureux, 2017-12-05 11:34: > > > Alvaro: [...] > > > What about Geneve (draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve)? The nvo3 WG is > focusing on > Geneve as the Standard encapsulation, but this document doesn’t > even mention it. > > > Indeed. But The decision by NVO3 to work on Geneve is fairly recent. > I have indicated in the BESS report that we'll likely be working > closeer > with NVO3 from now on. An individual draft on the applicability of > EVPN > to NVO3 networks is targeting NVO3 WG. Conversely, an individual > draft > on EVPN extensions for Geneve is targeting BESS. We have agreed that > we'll do cross reviews at the important milestones of these docs. > > > Perhaps draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay could hint on such a Geneve > work for EVPN; something like: "Adapting the EVPN control plane to the > Geneve encapsulation is out of the scope of this document, and is > expected to be covered in a separate document based on the same > architectural principles" > Perfect, thanks! Is that draft already in the works, or just planned? Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
