On December 4, 2017 at 5:16:49 PM, John E Drake ([email protected]) wrote:
(1) Coordination with nv03 For the Chairs: Except for some clarification comments [1] related to the current version, I see no other traffic in the nvo3 list related to this document. Was there some other coordination that I’m missing? I am not questioning having this document in bess (that’s perfectly fine); I’m just raising the needed coordination with other WGs, from the Charter: "The working group will also coordinate with...NVO3 working group for coordination of protocols to support data center VPNs.” *[JD] This draft had been around for nearly five years and the coordination happened a long time ago. Because NVO3 was not chartered to work on a control plane, the coordination was mainly to ensure that this draft met the requirements specified by that group.* The coordination I’m talking about is not the one related to the decision of where the work should be done. The question is to raise the point that if bess (in the case) is doing work related nvo3, then ideally the document wold have been flagged to nvo3 when it went into WGLC to allow them to review and comment. In this case, I don’t think this document includes anything that would be contentious in nvo3 — so I’m happy to explicitly let the WG know when we start the IETF LC. Alvaro.
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
