max.spicer wrote: > Oh yes, you just try patching the thing in order to try and maintain > some semblance of a secure system! Then realise that they've forgotten > to provide a packaging system that actually works. Hours of downtime, > no proper dependency tracking, broken packages from Sun. It's just > ridiculous. And that's if you don't want to run things like a recent > Apache, MySQL etc etc. If you do, then welcome (back) to compile > land.
Live Upgrade? > > And ZFS doesn't even work on the root filesystem. Ho ho ho. It does, I run ZFS root. > And don't even get me started on Blastwave... What's wrong with Blastwave? > Honestly, Debian/Ubuntu is the way forward. Solaris realise this - > it's why they've employed Ian Murdoch. About five years too late, but > never mind. Personally I prefer the Redhat flavours. I think it is telling that if ZFS ever got ported to Linux I'd switch back to Linux in the blink of an eye. R. _______________________________________________ beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
